[CCWG-ACCT] CSMM as WS2

Kavouss Arasteh kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Tue Sep 29 10:28:23 UTC 2015


Dear Jonathan
Pls kindly further elaborate what s do you mean by " the ability to spill
the board"
Regards
Kavouss

2015-09-29 3:30 GMT+02:00 Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>:

> All truth is said in jest.
>
>
> On Monday, September 28, 2015, avri doria <avri at ella.com> wrote:
>
>> Hmm. An April 1 RFC as a model solution for our issues with the board.
>> Might indeed be the right approach.
>>
>> Or was that just by way of comment. For example an explanation of why
>> putting things in ws2 is just silly and won't work.
>>
>>
>> avri
>>
>> Sent from a T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
>>
>>
>> -------- Original message --------
>> From: Chris Disspain <ceo at auda.org.au>
>> Date:09/28/2015 8:42 PM (GMT-05:00)
>> To: Jonathan Zuck <jzuck at actonline.org>
>> Cc: CCWG Accountability <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
>> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] CSMM as WS2
>>
>> Thanks Jonathan.
>>
>> I find RFC 1925 most instructive when dealing with circumstances such as
>> the one we currently find ourselves in.
>>
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1925.txt
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> On 29 Sep 2015, at 09:29 , Jonathan Zuck <jzuck at actonline.org> wrote:
>>
>> Here's a flyer. How about we make the determination that converting ICANN
>> to a membership organization is a WS2 initiative and design a stress test
>> for whatever we come up with in the interim that examines the community's
>> ability to make this transformation post transition. With the right set of
>> bylaws changes, the ability to spill the board, etc. we might be able to
>> meet the WS1 requirements of "sufficient leverage to accomplish WS2." We
>> could keep it pretty simple, eliminate the deadline, the NTIA, etc. and
>> work towards a membership model over the following year and spill the board
>> if they resist. I know that spilling the board is something we don't regard
>> as practical leverage for some random policy decision but I think it's
>> pretty credible for a restructuring. Thoughts?
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150929/559208bc/attachment.html>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list