[CCWG-ACCT] TR: Re: Implementation and Work Stream 2 role for CCWG-Accountability

Fri Apr 1 14:59:21 UTC 2016

Dear James,
Thank you
No problem then I will copy my message to you as I am not in the mailing
list of CWG
Then I leave it to you to kindly forward my message to CWG QUOTING MY
REQUEST  for  inclusion in the mailing list and participant list.
We need to hear from each other and listen to each other.
This is apparently a Multistakeholder process.
Regards
Kavouss
See Below

2016-04-01 16:46 GMT+02:00 James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net>:

> Im sorry Kavouss but the CCWG is not the place to debate the specifics of
> the IANA budget issues, the CWG and in particular  Design Team O has been
> working tirelessly on this issue and have made their recommendations, as
> you know there are bylaws resulting out of not just CCWG work but also CWG
> work and I don’t really want to get the lines of responsibility for those
> two blurred.
>
> -james
>
> From: <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of
> Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
> Date: Friday 1 April 2016 at 3:36 p.m.
> To: Mathieu Weill <Mathieu.Weill at afnic.fr>, Thomas Rickert <
> rickert at anwaelte.de>, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe at sanchez.mx>
> Cc: CCWG Accountability <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] TR: Re: Implementation and Work Stream 2 role
> for CCWG-Accountability
>
> Dear Co-Chairs
>
> Dear CCWG Colleagues,
>
> Thank you very much for your kind message.
>
> I wish to remind you and the Lawyers that the Mission of Working Group to
> prepare ICANN revised Bylaws is merely and solely limited and restricted to
> translate the relevant parts of the CCWG Supplemental Proposal dated 23
> February as approved by chattering organizations and then by ICANN Board
> and communicated to NTIA on 11 March 2016.
>
> In other words, those text appeared in that Report need to be translated
> into legal text with full authenticity and without ANY CHANGES WHAT SO EVER,
>
> Surprisingly, I have seen text distributed by Lawyers quoting new
> requirements e.g. from CWG for an equivalent amount of 3 years IANA budget
> as reserved budget for the implementation of PTI functions.
>
> While I do not have any difficulties to envisage a rescue budget for any
> rare and eventual circumstances that IANA financial resource face
> difficulties I have one basis and fundamental difficulties as follows
>
> CCWG has worked hardly during 14 months and gone through a very through
> analysis of all TEXTS WITHOUT ANY Exception and also gone through three
> public comments process and one supplemental process to finalize its
> proposal.
>
> That Proposal went through the approval process of Chartering
> Organizations and ICANN Board’s approval
>
> Consequently, any issue, no matter whether or not is relevant must be
>
> Seen and approved by the entire CCWG
>
> Published for public comments
>
> Approved by Chattering Organizations
>
> Approved by ICANN Board
>
> After the above-mentioned 5 steps are completed then relevant text may be
> included in the Draft Bylaws
>
> Having said that, I have no problem to raise the issues discussed by CWG
> in this regard and attaching their wishes to a CCWG Note TO BE SENT TO
> ICANN BOARD.
>
> ICANN Board could review the matter and make necessary provisions in their
> operational procedure such as opening a credit line labelled “IANA Budget
> Reserve” fed by ICANN with and annual equivalent amount of up to x% (NOT
> MORE THAN 10 5) in an accumulated manner to provide a rescue circumstances.
> However, this is an operational issue within the remit of the ICANN and has
> nothing to do with BYLAWS
>
> Regards
>
> KAVOUSS
>
> 2016-04-01 15:38 GMT+02:00 Sivasubramanian M <isolatedn at gmail.com>:
>
>> Dear Mathiew,
>>
>>
>> The call is for new "participants" for the Implementation Team and WS2.
>> This is not a call for Members of WS2 ?
>>
>> 
>> --
>> Sivasubramanian M <https://www.facebook.com/sivasubramanian.muthusamy>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Colleagues,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Attached is a communication to the Chartering Organizations, sent a few
>>> minutes ago, confirming that we are proceeding with an implementation
>>> oversight role.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best
>>>
>>> Mathieu
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *De :* Mathieu Weill [mailto:weill at afnic.fr]
>>> *Envoyé :* vendredi 1 avril 2016 12:38
>>> *À :* 'James M. Bladel'; '‘Thomas Schneider''; 'Alan Greenberg';
>>> 'Patrik Fältström'; 'Louie Lee'; oscar at lacnic.net; 'Katrina Sataki'
>>> *Cc :* 'Akram Atallah'; 'David Olive'; 'Steve Crocker'; 'Thomas
>>> Rickert'; 'gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org'; 'Tom Dale'; 'ACCT-Staff';
>>> 'ICANN At-Large Staff'; 'Bart Boswinkel'; 'León Felipe Sánchez Ambía';
>>> 'Jonathan Robinson'; 'Kimberly Carlson'; 'Olof Nordling'; 'Julie Hedlund';
>>> 'Julia Charvolen'; 'Lise Fuhr'; 'Theresa Swinehart'; 'Carlos Reyes'
>>> *Objet :* Re: Implementation and Work Stream 2 role for
>>> CCWG-Accountability
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear Chartering Organizations,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We are writing to you to follow up on our email from 6 March (available
>>> here
>>> <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/2016-March/011657.html>),
>>> and provide an update on the Work Stream 1 implementation oversight and
>>> scoping for Work Stream 2.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hearing no objections from the Chartering Organizations, we have
>>> proceeded with an implementation oversight role to ensure that the
>>> implementation is consistent with the Work Stream 1 report.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> To date, this work has been focused on the drafting of Bylaws and
>>> Articles of Incorporation. There is a critical path for the Bylaws
>>> drafting, and along with the CWG-Stewardship co-Chairs, we have instructed
>>> our legal teams to work with ICANN to draft the Bylaws. It is expected that
>>> a final draft of the proposed revisions to the Bylaws would be available
>>> for CCWG review by 2 April at the latest. The CCWG has two calls scheduled
>>> to facilitate its review of the Bylaws. Following CCWG review, the Bylaws
>>> would be published for an open community-wide public comment period.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It is important to remember that the overall transition schedule depends
>>> on completing this work. In order for the transition to take place by the
>>> end of the current contract between NTIA and ICANN on 30 September, ICANN
>>> must publish the Bylaws for a 30-day public comment period by *20 April*,
>>> and the Board would need to approve the changes to the Bylaws by *27
>>> May*.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Once the Bylaws work is complete, we will turn our focus to:
>>>
>>> ·         Completing the work on IRP that goes beyond the Bylaws
>>>
>>> ·         Finalizing the budget process in coordination with the
>>> CWG-Stewardship
>>>
>>> ·         Undertaking Work Stream 2 (WS2)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You may have seen a call for WS2 volunteers on the ICANN website last
>>> week (available here
>>> <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2016-03-25-en>). We ask that
>>> you also share this call for volunteers widely to ensure that all
>>> interested parties, including those outside of the ICANN ecosystem, are
>>> aware that they are welcome to participate in projects of WS2. It is
>>> important for our group to continue to strive for maximized diversity of
>>> our participants going forward.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We would like to emphasize that the CCWG-Accountability will remain open
>>> to anyone who wishes to join, and we will welcome informed individuals with
>>> relevant implementation and operational experience to join the
>>> CCWG-Accountability in this next phase. Finally, we are conscious of the
>>> heavy workload the CCWG-Accountability has been for your appointed members,
>>> and we would like to ask once more for Chartering Organizations to
>>> re-confirm member participation, and appoint new replacement members if
>>> necessary.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Leon Sanchez, Thomas Rickert, and Mathieu Weill
>>>
>>> CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> 
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160401/c4c64881/attachment.html>