[CCWG-ACCT] Proposed agenda for CCWG ACCT Review of Draft Bylaws Meeting | Thursday, 7 April 2016 @ 12:00 UTC

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear Mathieu
I was part of an expert team when similar course of actions were done in a UN agency between 1990-1992.
I therefore well know that unless an appropriate is taken there would be no legally valid transformation  of  written idea into legal text.
There seems to be no agreed approach by CCWG on how this transformation to  be carried forward.
Few people representing specific category of ICANN constituencies with specific interest  have drafted the bylaws which should be applied fir ALL
Regards
Kavousd 

Sent from my iPhone

> On 7 Apr 2016, at 08:26, Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr> wrote:
> 
> Dear Kavouss,
>  
> As a reminder, we have agreed that this detailed verification will be undertaken by our lawyers, once we have answered their questions. The legal team will then provide us with a certification that the Bylaws address each of the Recommendation. We are not there yet, but getting closer.
>  
> Best
> Mathieu
>  
> De : Kavouss Arasteh [mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com] 
> Envoyé : mercredi 6 avril 2016 23:37
> À : Mathieu Weill; Thomas Rickert; León Felipe Sánchez Ambía; Thomas.Schneider at bakom.admin.ch; gac at gac.icann.org; <gac-leadership at icann.org>
> Cc : MSSI Secretariat; CCWG-Accountability
> Objet : Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Proposed agenda for CCWG ACCT Review of Draft Bylaws Meeting | Thursday, 7 April 2016 @ 12:00 UTC
>  
> Dear Co -Chair,
> We need to establish a working method on how to verify  the Draft Bylaws to ensure their consistencies with the corresponding Recommendations from legal and accuracy point of view$
> The only way would be a paragraph by paragraph verification
> Regards
> Kavouss
>  
> 2016-04-06 17:46 GMT+02:00 Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>:
> Dear Co-Chairs,
> 
> On item 2 of the Agenda, you'd indicate during the call yesterday (it was also reflected in the notes) that responses to some of the questions and rationale will be provided.
> 
> I strongly suggest that these responses be provided in the next few hours (since we have exceeded a 24hrs window). It will be good that we have those drafts so some of us who may not attend (or may be audio only) can comment appropriately.
> 
> I am saying all these because it's been a practice in the past that decisions are made on second reading...
> 
> Regards
> Sent from my LG G4
> Kindly excuse brevity and typos
> 
> On 6 Apr 2016 1:34 p.m., "MSSI Secretariat" <mssi-secretariat at icann.org> wrote:
> <image001.gif>
> Dear All,
> In preparation for your call CCWG Accountability Review of Draft Bylaws Meeting  – Thursday, 7 April at 12:00 – 14:00 (time converter), see below a proposed agenda:
>       Proposed Agenda:
> 1. Opening Remarks
> 2. Second reading of question responses agreed on previous call
> 3. Resolution of remaining questions *
> 4. Next Steps
> 5. ICANN 56 - Helsinki
> 6.  AOB
>  
> * SAVE THE DATE, if needed, to complete Review of Bylaws:  Saturday, 9 April @ 04:00 (AM)UTC
>  
> Timeline reminder:  13 April – members of CCWG, CWG, Bylaws Coordination Group, Board and ICG to complete review of these DRAFT BYLAWS and provide feedback to legal teams
>  
> Documents for call:  See wiki page here
>  
> Adobe Connect: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/accountability/
>  
> Thank you!
> Kind regards,
> Brenda
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> 
>  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160407/2bf93a14/attachment-0001.html>