[CCWG-ACCT] CCWG - Proposed Responses to questions on Draft Bylaws

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Ruben +1
Kavousd


Sent from my iPhone

> On 8 Apr 2016, at 21:54, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk at nic.br> wrote:
> 
> 
>> Em 8 de abr de 2016, à(s) 15:38:000, Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu> escreveu:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>   Q1
>>> 
>>> On the Mission, q1, I think it is extremely unfortunate to agree to remove
>>> the restriction of "in the root zone".
>> 
>> I agree. In fact, I was shocked to see in the explanation for this removal the idea that ICANN has authority over third-level domains, which as far as I know it has never even attempted to exercise.
> 
> 
> ICANN might have authority over third-level in very specific circumstances. The one I know is a gTLD registry offering registrations on the 3rd level; even though most gTLDs offer registrations at 2nd level, if registry operator wishes to sell domains at 3rd level, ICANN has contractual authority to establish conditions (like which 2nd levels) and requirements (like proper escrow of registration data). This RSEP public comment is one of such cases:
> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/wed-amendment-2014-06-04-en
> 
> And that probably won't be even limited to 3rd level per se... the DNS maximum label size is the limit. 
> 
> 
> 
> Rubens
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community