[CCWG-ACCT] ICANN doesn't "allocate" or "assign" beyond the root (was Re: CCWG - Proposed Responses to questions on Draft Bylaws)
Mueller, Milton L
milton at gatech.edu
Mon Apr 11 03:17:51 UTC 2016
Agree 100%, this really is a mission-critical issue, to coin a phrase. This is not a quibble over phrasing.
> -----Original Message-----
> The current bylaw language quite clearly says not only that ICANN can make
> such a rule, but that making rules of this sort is part of ICANN's mission. By
> restricting the policy making throughout the tree to the contractual
> relationships ICANN actually has, we stop making this about where in the DNS
> the name appears and turn it into a normal contractual obligation. This gets
> away from the notion of ICANN-as-regulator.
>
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list