[CCWG-ACCT] TR: [bylaws-coord] Requested clarification of Question 29; further clarification request for Question 7

[Dr Eberhard W Lisse]

The first sentence is incorrect.

Even valid arguments can be opposed, and are being opposed.  All the
time.  Even by Mr Arasteh's employer, as a matter of fact.

That's why there is discussion/negotiation.  Often not the most valid
argument prevails, but the least invalid :-)-O. And of course often
also the ones made by the most skilled negotiators or the ones backed
by the most powerful.

I am not commenting on the second sentence.

el



On 2016-04-12 21:16, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
> Opposing to valid argument is identical to opposing discussion
> .what was done last night is clear evidence  of opposing to a healthy
> discussion
[...]
-- 
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse  \        / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
el at lisse.NA            / *     |   Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421             \     /
Bachbrecht, Namibia     ;____/