[CCWG-ACCT] .Africa Preliminary Injunction

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear Carlos
No we don't
It was discussed at length but no clear definition apart from those already in the Bylaws has beed seriously adopted/agreed
Kavouss    


Sent from my iPhone

> On 13 Apr 2016, at 18:10, Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. <crg at isoc-cr.org> wrote:
> 
> Do we already have ICANN official public interest definition? Or are we still in the process of finding it?
> 
> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
> +506 8837 7176
> Skype: carlos.raulg
> Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
>> On 13 Apr 2016, at 10:03, Nigel Roberts wrote:
>> 
>> The 'public interest' is exactly what it says.. The global public.
>> 
>> He refers SPECIFICALLY to the African internet users' public interest in the judgment.
>> 
>> 
>> As follows:
>> 
>>> On balance, the Court finds it more prejudicial to
>>> the African community, and the international community in general, if the delegation of .Africa is made
>>> prior to a determination on the fairness of the process by which it was delegated.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community