[CCWG-ACCT] The whois/RDS-RT bylaw vs. current activities

[Alberto Soto]

At this stage of implementation, it can not change anything that has been
decided previously...

Kind regards
Alberto

-----Mensaje original-----
De: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] En nombre de avri
doria
Enviado el: sábado, 30 de abril de 2016 12:51 a.m.
Para: accountability-cross-community at icann.org
Asunto: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] The whois/RDS-RT bylaw vs. current activities



On 29-Apr-16 15:53, Christopher Wilkinson wrote:
> > 
  Whois reviews start from the premise that current policy is
> correct and should not be changed and all we need to do is review its 
> effectiveness?
>
> Well, actually, the current Whois policy is not correct, and should be 
> changed.

I see no reason a Review could not point out errors and recommend that a
policy process do something about them.

avri




---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

This email has been protected by YAC (Yet Another Cleaner) http://www.yac.mx