[CCWG-ACCT] [community-finance] IANA Stewardship Transition - Project Expenses - FY16 Q3 update

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear Xavier
I have sent you the following question to which I have not received any
reply
Perhaps you have been very busy and overlooked my questions
I still awaiting for clarifications
Regards
KAVOUSS
Copy of questions raised many weeks ago
Dear Xavier
Thank you for all info.
Pls clarify the following
1.What is prfessional advice :;this advice is given to whom ,on what
subject and why is needed
2. what is lobbing here. who lobbies for whom and on what and the need for
such lobbies
3 Who checks and confirm  the legal costs by three legal entities, who
decide that there was a need for such legal advice and who checks and
control ther tme spent..Many of these advice were repeatation of previous
adfvices and just cut and p[aste from one advice to others .Please review
all advices given from the begining of 2015 till now
We neeed all these detailed info .
Regards
Kavouss

2016-08-15 16:25 GMT+02:00 avri doria <avri at apc.org>:

>
>
> On 15-Aug-16 06:43, parminder wrote:
> > I just said that an Antigua based betting company will be ill-advised
> > to try to take up a closed gTLD in its name and conduct its business
> > under it, because it is liable to be seized whenever US authorities
> > want to do so (by their jurisdiction control over ICANN) . Same is
> > true of a drug company, say from India, planning global e-com trade of
> > generic drugs. It will also be ill-advised to risk a closed gTLD in
> > its name to do such global business, for the same reason.
>
> I thought that this has to do with the jurisdiction of the registry and
> the rregistrar itself.  And while it may cause concern because there are
> not as many registries and registrars in non US jurisdictions, there are
> some and could be more in time. It may also mean that greater efforts
> should be taken to inform people of the jurisdiction their registration
> is under and whose laws they are subject to, but I do not see how the
> location of ICANN main office or place of incorproation affects this issue.
>
> In any case aren't the issues relatiing to the jurisdiction of
> registries and registrars  among the ones being discussed in the Juris
> sub group?
>
> But the conversation has been quite far ranging so could well be missing
> the point of the disagreement.
>
> avri
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160815/b20be917/attachment-0001.html>