[CCWG-ACCT] Jurisdiction Proposed Questions and Poll Results

[John Laprise]

Possibilities of jurisdictional immunity? Could you please provide examples of organizations that enjoy such.

 

Best regards, 

 

John Laprise, Ph.D.

Consulting Scholar

 

 <http://www.linkedin.com/in/jplaprise/> http://www.linkedin.com/in/jplaprise/

 

 

 

From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of parminder
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 7:10 AM
To: accountability-cross-community at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Jurisdiction Proposed Questions and Poll Results

 

 

 

On Saturday 17 December 2016 12:40 AM, Mueller, Milton L wrote:

SNIP 
John Laprise's wording was much, much better: 
"What are the advantages or disadvantages, if any, relating to changing ICANN’s jurisdiction*, particularly with regard to the actual operation of ICANN’s policies and accountability mechanisms?"


This formulation does not include possibilities of jurisdictional immunity. 

Something like 




"What are the advantages or disadvantages, if any, relating to changing ICANN’s jurisdiction*, or providing possible jurisdictional immunity, particularly with regard to the actual operation of ICANN’s policies and accountability mechanisms?"


would be better.

parminder 



 
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org> 
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20161219/7cff188e/attachment-0001.html>