[CCWG-ACCT] The 60 percent solution

[Dr Eberhard W Lisse]

I can live with 60% too.

Do we need a Public Comment on it?

el

--
Sent from Dr Lisse's iPhone 6s

On 1 Feb 2016, 02:31 +0200, Drazek, Keith<kdrazek at verisign.com>, wrote:
> Thanks to Kavouss for this suggestion, and to Greg for highlighting it. I hope we can all consider this as a possible further compromise solution that might bring us to resolution. I know we are all committed to the successful completion of our work in a timely manner. Let's not miss this opportunity to reach consensus and finish our work in a collaborative manner.
> 
> Regards to all.
> Keith
> 
> 
> On Jan 31, 2016, at 6:49 PM, Greg Shatan<gregshatanipc at gmail.com(mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com)>wrote:
> 
> > All,
> > 
> > I wanted to pluck this suggestion out of the email swamp.
> > 
> > Kavouss made an alternative proposal concerning another threshold between Simple Majority and 2/3 -- the alternative threshold is 60%.
> > 
> > Speaking only for myself, this could be a simple but creative way out of the current situation.It is a literally a middle ground between the current majority threshold and the previously proposed 2/3 threshold:
> > 
> > 
> > Votes
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Percentage
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Result
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 8/16
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 50%
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > No
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 9/16
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 56.25%
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Yes, by majority
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 10/16
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 62.50%
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Yes, if by 60%
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 11/16
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 68.75%
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Yes, if by 2/3
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > This would require one more vote than the current threshold and one less vote than the 2/3 threshold.Win/win?
> > 
> > Greg
> > 
> > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 5:41 AM, Kavouss Arasteh<kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com(mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com)>wrote:
> > > Dear Co-Chairs
> > > Pls kindly confirm that you have received my last alternative proposal concerning another threshold between Simple Majority and 2/3. This alternative threshould is60%
> > > There has been many cases considered with that level of threshold
> > > Pls confirm its recption and confirm actions to be taken before you go to poll
> > > Awaiting for your reply
> > > Kavouss
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > [...]
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> > > > Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org(mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org)
> > > > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> > > Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org(mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org)
> > > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> > > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> > Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org(mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org)
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> > 
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160201/1a69b536/attachment.html>