[CCWG-ACCT] Creative solutions for Rec.11
nigel at channelisles.net
Mon Feb 1 09:14:39 UTC 2016
Why wouldn't this happen?
It's exactly what happened in 1998 . . why would ICANN abandon a plan
that's worked for it before.
> 2. The rule is imposed despite GNSO objections, and ICANN begins its
> post-transition life constituted on a basis opposed by GNSO. Far from
> being seen as "more accountable", the perception will be that an opaque
> process (this CCWG) overrode the community objections expressed a year
> ago, and reiterated this winter. This will seed in the GNSO lasting
> distrust of both the GAC and the ICANN structure as a whole.
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community