[CCWG-ACCT] The 60 percent solution

Kavouss Arasteh kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Mon Feb 1 12:50:03 UTC 2016


Dear Co-Chair
I spent my life on international hard decision making sometime fully
political.
I have been succeded to try ion finding siolutions
In World Radiocommunication Conference, 2015, at the last minute, one
government moved a motion of order which could be been resulted to voting
which everbody disliked
I moved another motion of order ( requesting suspension of the meeting for
15 mints) my motion of ordfered in the formal ITU rank superceded the
former motion of order and thus accepted.
The Plenary suspended its meeting for 15 mintes. During that period I
gathered all concerned parties at a cornder and described that a bad
Conference is the one which decide on an issue by voting due to the fact
that voting signifies division and divergence of views. I encouage all to
accept a compromise that I made.
The compromise was accepted by the group .We went t back to plenary and
that government which moved a motion of order withdrew his motion on the
consdition that my compromise be debated,
My compromise was in fact immediately accepted even without being debated.
That saved the Conferencer deciding on an issue through voting.
I have done that many times except one time for which I feel terribly aorry
even after many years.
Pls kindly take my compromise for 605 of threshold insted of 2/3 ( 66.66 %)
Best Regards
Kavouss

2016-02-01 13:21 GMT+01:00 Schaefer, Brett <Brett.Schaefer at heritage.org>:

> I'm a bit confused. Wouldn't the arguments against the 2/3 requirement,
> which is after all 66%, apply just as much to the 60% proposal?
>
> I think Becky's proposal gets much closer to addressing the substance of
> the concerns raised.
>
>
> ________________________________
> Brett Schaefer
> Jay Kingham Senior Research Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs
> Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom Davis Institute for National Security
> and Foreign Policy
> The Heritage Foundation
> 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE
> Washington, DC 20002
> 202-608-6097
> heritage.org<http://heritage.org/>
>
> On Jan 31, 2016, at 6:50 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com<mailto:
> gregshatanipc at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I wanted to pluck this suggestion out of the email swamp.
>
> Kavouss made an alternative proposal concerning another threshold between
> Simple Majority and 2/3 -- the alternative threshold is 60%.
>
> Speaking only for myself, this could be a simple but creative way out of
> the current situation.  It is a literally a middle ground between the
> current majority threshold and the previously proposed 2/3 threshold:
>
> Votes
>
> Percentage
>
> Result
>
> 8/16
>
> 50%
>
> No
>
> 9/16
>
> 56.25%
>
> Yes, by majority
>
> 10/16
>
> 62.50%
>
> Yes, if by 60%
>
> 11/16
>
> 68.75%
>
> Yes, if by 2/3
>
>
> This would require one more vote than the current threshold and one less
> vote than the 2/3 threshold.  Win/win?
>
> Greg
>
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 5:41 AM, Kavouss Arasteh <
> kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com<mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Dear Co-Chairs
> Pls kindly confirm that you have received my last alternative proposal
> concerning another threshold between Simple Majority and 2/3. This
> alternative threshould is 60%
> There has been many cases considered with that level of threshold
> Pls confirm its recption and confirm actions to be taken before you go to
> poll
> Awaiting for your reply
> Kavouss
>
>
> [...]
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org<mailto:
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community<
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org<mailto:
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community<
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org<mailto:
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160201/89022c4e/attachment.html>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list