[CCWG-ACCT] The 60 percent solution

Alan Greenberg alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Mon Feb 1 05:06:57 UTC 2016

Indeed. Thanks to both and I am pretty sure that the ALAC would support this.

Although this is not a Seven-Per-Cent Solution, it may well be the 
only answer left once we have eliminated all the others! *


* If you don't understand that comment, either ignore it or see 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Seven-Per-Cent_Solution and 

At 31/01/2016 07:30 PM, Drazek, Keith wrote:

>Thanks to Kavouss for this suggestion, and to Greg for highlighting 
>it. I hope we can all consider this as a possible further compromise 
>solution that might bring us to resolution. I know we are all 
>committed to the successful completion of our work in a timely 
>manner. Let's not miss this opportunity to reach consensus and 
>finish our work in a collaborative manner.
>Regards to all.
>On Jan 31, 2016, at 6:49 PM, Greg Shatan 
><<mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:
>>I wanted to pluck this suggestion out of the email swamp.
>>Kavouss made an alternative proposal concerning another threshold 
>>between Simple Majority and 2/3 -- the alternative threshold is 60%.
>>Speaking only for myself, this could be a simple but creative way 
>>out of the current situation.  It is a literally a middle ground 
>>between the current majority threshold and the previously proposed 
>>2/3 threshold:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160201/3f224c6b/attachment.html>

More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list