[CCWG-ACCT] The 60 percent solution

[Schaefer, Brett]

Kavouss,

The reason is that the concerns are broader than Recommendation 11. There is also the interplay of Recommendation 11 with Recommendations 1 and 10. Becky is trying to address those broader concerns in her proposal.

Best,

Brett


________________________________
Brett Schaefer
Jay Kingham Senior Research Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs
Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom Davis Institute for National Security and Foreign Policy
The Heritage Foundation
214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE
Washington, DC 20002
202-608-6097
heritage.org<http://heritage.org/>
From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Kavouss Arasteh
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2016 11:36 AM
To: Matthew Shears
Cc: accountability-cross-community at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] The 60 percent solution


Dear Brett
Dear Mathieu
No
There are many support for this fairly simple approach
Becky, suggestion , while highly appreciated, is complex and could involve extensive study from legal, operational and procedural view point .
It may also be considered outside our mandate since it nay be considered indirectly or ,,?as some sort of restructuring.( see views expressed in its regard)
Why not take this quite simple and straightforward approach
Regards
Kavousd

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160201/e8012d79/attachment.html>