[CCWG-ACCT] Clarification of the 60% for Board Rejection of GAC Consensus Advice
Dr Eberhard W Lisse
el at lisse.NA
Tue Feb 2 08:49:59 UTC 2016
Right,
so they could not chicken out and at least have to abstain.
Makes sense.
el
On 2016-02-02 10:47, Nigel Roberts wrote:
> NO
>
> It means 60% of those Board members entitled to vote, present and
> actually voting.
>
>
> On 02/02/16 08:45, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
>> Just so to be sure
>>
>> 60% means 60% of those Board Members entitled to vote, currently 10.8
>> (11) of 18, right? In other words not 12.6 (13) of 21.
>>
>> greetings, el
>>
>>
--
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
el at lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421 \ /
Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list