[CCWG-ACCT] Recommendation 11, 2/3 board threshold, GAC consensus, and finishing
Dr Eberhard W Lisse
el at lisse.NA
Tue Feb 2 14:55:30 UTC 2016
I disagree, we can most certainly and most easily take both, they are
not exclusive, in fact the complement each other.
On 2016-02-02 16:47, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
> Dear Andrew
> Dear All,
> I have just asked Becky to slightly modify her text by referring to"
> Board's Actions inregard with GAC aDVICE " and not ' GAC Advice" due to
> the fact that IRP could be invoked against Board's action and not an AC
> or a SO .
> She kindly confirmed that
> Second the alternative of 60% is MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE with Her Proposal
> after editorial amendments mentioned above.
> We CAN NOT TAKE BOTH OF THEM AS TWO MUTUALLY INCLUSIVE OPTIONS
> 2016-02-02 15:32 GMT+01:00 Paul Rosenzweig
> <paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
> <mailto:paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com>>:
> I agree with Andrew. Logically, there is no reason they are mutually
> exclusive. Politically, they are quite interdependent. For some the
> willingness to accept 60% might very well be contingent on Becky's
> being adopted.
> Paul Rosenzweig
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
el at lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421 \ /
Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community