[CCWG-ACCT] Recommendation 11, 2/3 board threshold, GAC consensus, and finishing

[Jonathan Zuck]

Yes




On 2/2/16, 10:17 AM, "accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org on behalf of Malcolm Hutty" <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org on behalf of malcolm at linx.net> wrote:

>
>
>On 02/02/2016 14:26, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>>> The addition of the following text might help allieviate that concern:
>>>
>>> "This clause does not create a presumption that the Board shall accept
>>> such advice, or change the criteria for how it shall be evaluated."
>> 
>> I'm a little uncomfortable with all the ways the document keeps
>> growing descriptions of what it is not. 
>
>Fair enough. I'm sure it can be stated in a positive fashion; I didn't
>expect this to be final bylaws text anyway.
>
>Can we agree the principle that we're only changing the voting threshold
>and not trying to create a new presumption of obedience, and leave it to
>the lawyers to come up with the best language to avoid any unintended
>consequences?
>
>Malcolm.
>
>-- 
>            Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523
>   Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog
> London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/
>
>                 London Internet Exchange Ltd
>       Monument Place, 24 Monument Street, London EC3R 8AJ
>
>         Company Registered in England No. 3137929
>       Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community