[CCWG-ACCT] Notes-Recordings-Transcript link for CCWG ACCT Meeting #82 - 2 February
Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au
Wed Feb 3 03:18:22 UTC 2016
Just some brief comments on the discussion on operational procedures for AoC reviews:
>> There are 3 questions for the Board so we can understand these requirements better.
>> Would the community have input on developing or approving these initial Oper. Standards?
I would expect so. I would see that ultimately each review team should actually develop operational standards overtime just as the nominating committee has done. The community should certainly have input into those processes.
>> Could the CCWG proposals on size & composition, working methods, and timing be considered the starting point for the Operational Standards?
>> What is process for revising and approving changes later on?
For detailed operational processes - I would see that the review teams could probably approve them for each review with input from the SOs and ACs. Not dissimilar to how the CCWG developed its charter.
>> SDelBianco - We only require max, size, composition, timings and methods. The rest can be in Ops.
That makes sense. I think for the bylaws it should stay at a high level with respect to each of those topics.
WE will have a looka t the language that is intended to guide the development of the bylaws and maybe suggest some edits for consideration.
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community