[CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: Timing and agenda Thursday's call and options to be discussed?

Kavouss Arasteh kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Wed Feb 3 09:16:37 UTC 2016


Dear Jorge
Yes I agree with you.
If these two devoted calls are opened to new or old multiple proposals we
will get no results
The Co-Chairs need to clarify the matter
Regards
Kavouss


2016-02-03 10:10 GMT+01:00 <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>:

> Dear Kavouss
>
>
>
> I fully understand your point.
>
>
>
> The more reason that the co-chairs should clarify what will be discussed
> exactly on the Thursday and Monday calls.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> Jorge
>
>
>
> *Von:* Kavouss Arasteh [mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com]
> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 3. Februar 2016 10:07
> *An:* Cancio Jorge BAKOM <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>
> *Cc:* Thomas Rickert <thomas at rickert.net>; Mathieu Weill <
> mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>; León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe at sanchez.mx>;
> accountability-cross-community at icann.org
> *Betreff:* Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: Timing and agenda Thursday's call and
> options to be discussed?
>
>
>
> Dear Jorge,
>
> Thank you for your message.
>
> You may have noted that,* as participant to CCWGat call 81.*I made a
> compromise proposal,strictly limited to two option in Annex 11 of Rec
> 11,NAMELY 2/3  AND SIMPLE MAJORITY, witzh a view to get out of dreadlocks.
>
> Later on I have noted that after Beckie made her proposal in regard with
> Rec.1 ( disabling GAC  in regard with exercising its community power, in
> case that other community innvoked IRP regading Board's action with respect
> to GAC advice, claiming 8 alleging that the Board's actions exceeded it
> mission,
>
> Surprisingly I have noted that those 5 persons  very offen speaking  of
> the need to exclude GAC TO EXERCISE ANY POWER AND ARE PARTISANS OF st 18
> AND 50% SIMPLE MAJORITY FOR GAC ADVICE, ATTEMPTING TO COMBINE bECJKIE'S
> SO-XALLED "INNOVATIVE PROPOSAL "WITH 60% .
>
> Last night I formally withdrew that proposal which I made as *CCWG
> PARTICIPANT.*
>
> *Consequently, no proposal should be associated to me in that regard*
>
> *Best wishes*
>
> *Kavouss *
>
>
>
> 2016-02-03 7:01 GMT+01:00 <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>:
>
> Hello co-chairs
>
> Could you please respond to the email below?
>
> Consultations in our constituencies are quite difficult whithout a clear
> process and timeline and agenda from your side.
>
> Please answer this in full and do not point to general information:
>
>
> We would also be grateful for an agenda, including a clear identification
> (and the text) of the options to be discussed, as was requested during this
> morning's call in the chat.
>
> thanks and regards
>
> Jorge
>
> Von meinem iPhone gesendet
>
> Anfang der weitergeleiteten E‑Mail:
>
> Von: <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch<mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>>
> Datum: 2. Februar 2016 um 18:51:55 MEZ
> An: "accountability-cross-community at icann.org<mailto:
> accountability-cross-community at icann.org>" <
> accountability-cross-community at icann.org<mailto:
> accountability-cross-community at icann.org>>
> Betreff: Timing and agenda Thursday's call and options to be discussed?
>
>
> Dear co-chairs and staff
>
> Have you already sent the invites for the call on Thursday?
>
> We would also be grateful for an agenda, including a clear identification
> (and the text) of the options to be discussed, as was requested during this
> morning's call in the chat.
>
> Thanks and regards
>
> Jorge
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160203/58cb0973/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list