[CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: Timing and agenda Thursday's call and options to be discussed?

Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch
Wed Feb 3 09:46:40 UTC 2016

Dear Jordan

I appreciate your message.

However, what is sought is a formal answer and guidance by the co-chairs on all points already raised during yesterday’s call.

Best regards


Von: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] Im Auftrag von Jordan Carter
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. Februar 2016 10:37
An: Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
Betreff: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: Timing and agenda Thursday's call and options to be discussed?


I thought that the process and items were perfectly clear. I am not a co-chair and haven't discussed this with them, so I might be wrong, but read on if you like...

The two calls on Thursday and Monday should be seen as "working sessions" - they are being held to see if some consensus can be arrived at among the group about how to break the deadlock we find ourselves in.

Becky has ably set out the current proposal.

My view and understanding is that nothing is off the table in those discussions that is part of a constructive effort to arrive at a solution to Rec 11 (and if necessary consequential amendments to others) that we can, as a group, form consensus around.

As such, nobody "owns" any proposals, and new ideas to break the deadlock are not only welcomed - they are positively encouraged.

Because both calls are Working meetings, the only topic is the above, and there isn't going to be any formal decision-making.  That does not mean the co-chairs might not employ a range of approaches to see where the group is at, which might include polling, but I am sure it does mean that NO DECISIONS per se will be finalised on either call.

Just my tuppence.


On 3 February 2016 at 22:30, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el at lisse.na<mailto:el at lisse.na>> wrote:
I agree and not only because I have a hard stop at 13:00 on Thursday
but not on Monday.

So, if we did any polling, we'd need to do it before 13:00 tomorrow or
on Monday.

I do however again appoint Stephen Deerhake as Proxy should I be
unable to make the poll, if any and would request Accountability Staff
to note this for the record.

greetings, el

On 2016-02-03 11:10, Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch<mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch> wrote:
> Dear Kavouss
> I fully understand your point.
> The more reason that the co-chairs should clarify what will be
> discussed exactly on the Thursday and Monday calls.
> Regards
> Jorge
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>

Jordan Carter

Chief Executive

+64-4-495-2118 (office) | +64-21-442-649 (mob)
Email: jordan at internetnz.net.nz<mailto:jordan at internetnz.net.nz>
Skype: jordancarter
Web: www.internetnz.nz<http://www.internetnz.nz>

A better world through a better Internet

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160203/0077dfb8/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list