[CCWG-ACCT] Concern over Proposed Core Value 5 (as per CCWG ACCT 82 discussion)

Kavouss Arasteh kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Wed Feb 3 16:30:14 UTC 2016


Becky + 1
Kavouss

2016-02-03 17:28 GMT+01:00 Burr, Becky <Becky.Burr at neustar.biz>:

> I’m sorry, I just do not see how this could possibly be read to preclude
> the African, Latin American, or Caribbean strategy.  I think that there are
> potentially significant unintended consequences flowing from breaking the
> link that says the global public interest is identified through the bottom
> up, multistakeholder policy development process.
>
> *J. Beckwith Burr*
> *Neustar, Inc.* / Deputy General Counsel & Chief Privacy Officer
> 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington D.C. 20006
> *Office:* +1.202.533.2932  *Mobile:* +1.202.352.6367 */* *neustar.biz*
> <http://www.neustar.biz>
>
> From: Tijani BEN JEMAA <tijani.benjemaa at fmai.org.tn>
> Date: Wednesday, February 3, 2016 at 7:45 AM
> To: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
> Cc: Accountability Community <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Concern over Proposed Core Value 5 (as per CCWG
> ACCT 82 discussion)
>
> Alan and all,
>
> I agree with you and prefer your first proposal, but can live with the
> second one assuming that « and specifically » be replaced by «  mainly ».
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Tijani BEN JEMAA*
> Executive Director
> Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (*FMAI*)
> Phone: +216 98 330 114
>             +216 52 385 114
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Le 3 févr. 2016 à 05:09, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> a
> écrit :
>
> At the meeting last night, I raised an issue related to the proposed Core
> Value 6. It was also raised in an e-mail several days earlier, but that did
> not attract any comments.
>
> In the current Bylaws, Core Value 6 reads:
>
> "Introducing and promoting competition in the registration of domain names
> where practicable and beneficial in the public interest."
>
> The proposed version (now Core Value 5) is:
>
> "Introducing and promoting competition in the registration of domain names
> where practicable and beneficial in the public interest as identified
> through the bottom-up,  multistakeholder policy development process."
>
> In the context of the Bylaws, the expression "policy development process"
> is used only in the context of the ccNSO and GNSO PDPs. The problem is that
> not everything that ICANN does is "policy", and certainly not developed by
> the GNSO and ccNSO.
>
> An example is the Strategy for Africa that was initiated in 2012 and by
> all reports is having very positive results. One of ICANN's strategic goals
> is to improve participation from the African region. An essential part of
> this is to build up the DNS industry there. The African strategy was
> certainly developed through a bottom-up MS process, but just as certainly
> not through a "policy development process" as described in the ICANN Bylaws.
>
> Under the proposed wording, part of the African Strategy could be rules
> out of order, and the same goes for the Latin-America & Caribbean Strategy.
> I have to assume that this is not the intent of the CCWG.
>
> I would be happy to simply replace "the bottom-up,  multistakeholder
> policy development process" by "a bottom-up, multistakeholder process".
>
> However, for those who worry that this might be an escape hatch related to
> the GNSO and ccNSO PDPs, another alternative is:
>
> "Introducing and promoting competition in the registration of domain names
> where practicable and beneficial in the public interest as identified
> through bottom-up,  multistakeholder processes and specifically the policy
> development processes when applicable to GNSO and ccNSO policies."
>
> But I really feel that this is to much detail for a Bylaw Core Value!
>
> Alan
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_accountability-2Dcross-2Dcommunity&d=CwQFaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=SuJ3nLhK2VF3QCvO-vpM69BZ7nYz9DnU2a07UIB7ecA&s=427V5ijMF4DHDCebM1hW5rQRWxpeao1CNXncuzTeW-I&e=>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160203/db0c30f2/attachment.html>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list