[CCWG-ACCT] Summary of proposals discussed last night in context of Rec. #11

Kavouss Arasteh kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Wed Feb 3 19:50:29 UTC 2016

Let us leave the issue forming
As something is evolving which could addressed all these issues

Sent from my iPhone

> On 3 Feb 2016, at 04:54, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 11:53:05PM +0100, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
>> Our mandate is limited to discuss the  initial Becky’s  proposal and mine
>> only
> I wasn't aware tht we were so procedure bound, and I do not recall
> those instructions from the chairs.  Moreover, my quick review of the
> transcript from the last call also does not show such a rigid
> procedural approach.  On the contrary, it seems that the goal is to be
> as flexible as possible with any procedure at all in the interests of
> forging a widely-acceptable consensus.  Such a flexible attitude is
> what I have previously observed from our co-chairs, so it does not
> surprise me.
> Therefore, I'm wondering on what grounds you think there was such a
> strict limit on what we could do.
> Best regards,
> A
> -- 
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list