[CCWG-ACCT] Recommendation 6 and a way forward to include compromise text suggested by the Board

Alan Greenberg alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Fri Feb 5 16:38:12 UTC 2016

I think that we want a chartering process comparable to that of the 
CCWG. I presume that if a HR group were to come into existence and 
was not chartered by a reasonable number of orgs, then the Board 
would not agree to the "semi-binding" nature of the outcomes (forgive 
me inventing a new word to describe the CCWG-Board process previously 
agreed to).


At 05/02/2016 01:52 AM, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
>Hello Alan,
> >>  I don't understand the concept of a Cross Community WG 
> chartered by only one AC/SO.
>Good pick up.   Might be best described as "two or more",  or "at 
>least three" if you want a minimum threshold.
>Bruce Tonkin

More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list