[CCWG-ACCT] Time to make a decision (was Re: Responses to Rafael's Questions)

[Izumi Okutani]

+ 1.

I think Keith's post captures the situation very well. 
Just to also share that we discussed it in the ASO and we would not be opposed to Kavouss + Becky proposal.


Izumi

On 2016/02/07 10:10, Matthew Shears wrote:
> +1   Time to wrap this up.
> 
> On 06/02/2016 14:48, Jonathan Zuck wrote:
>>
>> Well said
>>
>> Jonathan Zuck
>> President
>> ACT: The App Association
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 11:55 AM -0800, "Drazek, Keith" <kdrazek at verisign.com <mailto:kdrazek at verisign.com>> wrote:
>>
>> All,
>>
>> As I have respectfully noted several times, and will reiterate again...the GAC as a whole has taken no position on Rec-1 and Rec-11 and is highly unlikely to do so. There simply is not consensus within the GAC on these issues. The Arasteh/Burr proposal is as close as we're likely to get to a compromise that will not be rejected by any Chartering Org and will be acceptable to NTIA and Congress. This is it. It's time to finalize this work and deliver a proposal to the Chartering Organizations so we can meet the Marrakech deadline for approval.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Keith
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> > On Feb 6, 2016, at 2:17 PM, James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > I have to agree with Andrew on this, this is a topic we can debate for weeks on end. We need to move forward.
>> >
>> > -jg
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> On 06/02/2016, 6:53 p.m., "accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org on behalf of Andrew Sullivan" <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org on behalf of ajs at anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >>> On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 09:31:03PM +0000, Perez Galindo, Rafael wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> For that reason, I believe it should be very carefully analyzed and assessed, from an implementing and legal POV. Such a decision cannot be taken in a rush, without considering its consequences and possible side effects.
>> >>
>> >> I agree it should be carefully analysed and contemplated, but that
>> >> analysis and contemplation should take place before the next call not
>> >> dedicated to Rec. 11 (my calendar seems to think that's Tuesday).
>> >>
>> >> The CCWG needs to come to a close and ship something -- even a report
>> >> out that there's no solution would be better than more delay.  There
>> >> is simply no more time to dither.  The transition (or its failure) is
>> >> waiting on this CCWG's output.  The operational communities need to
>> >> know what their next available range(s) of action will be.
>> >>
>> >> Moreover, if the GAC really cannot accept this proposed compromise, it
>> >> seems at least to me that the hope of any compromise ever being
>> >> reached is roughly zero.  Therefore, the CCWG members should vote on
>> >> something and move on.  I vastly prefer consensus, but in the
>> >> community where I usually work we would have declared this consensus
>> >> rough some time ago and closed the discussion.
>> >>
>> >> Best regards,
>> >>
>> >> A
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Andrew Sullivan
>> >> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> >> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> > Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>