[CCWG-ACCT] Recommendation 6 and a way forward to include compromise text suggested by the Board

[Tijani BEN JEMAA]

- The Board seems to feel strongly that it would be advisable
	I would like Why it would be advisable for Board

- It may well be that the "right" people to discuss a certain issue may not be the same as those on the current CCWG. Or may not be the ones with the interest, knowledge and time.
	Anyone who would be the « right » person to discuss the issue, who has the interest, knowledge and/or time, and who is not now on the CCWG may join as participant since the groupe is fully open.

- Better opportunity to work in parallel
	In the CCWG, we have the experience of working in parallel in work parties.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tijani BEN JEMAA
Executive Director
Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI)
Phone: +216 98 330 114
            +216 52 385 114
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


> Le 7 févr. 2016 à 20:05, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> a écrit :
> 
> There are several possible reasons:
> 
> - The Board seems to feel strongly that it would be advisable
> - It may well be that the "right" people to discuss a certain issue may not be the same as those on the current CCWG. Or may not be the ones with the interest, knowledge and time.
> - Better opportunity to work in parallel
> 
> It may not happen, but if there is a will within the chartering organizations, why should it not be allowed?
> 
> But for the record, I was not necessarily advocating it in my reply, but trying to ensure that if it did end up in the proposal, that it be worded reasonably.
> 
> Alan
> 
> At 06/02/2016 12:20 PM, Tijani BEN JEMAA wrote:
>> If there is a reason for breaking the CCWG charter and taking some parts of WS 2 tasks out of the CCWG-accountability, I would like to know it.
>>  
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Tijani BEN JEMAA
>> Executive Director
>> Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI)
>> Phone: +216 98 330 114
>>           +216 52 385 114
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Le 5 févr. 2016 à 17:38, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca <mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> > a écrit :
>>> 
>>> I think that we want a chartering process comparable to that of the CCWG. I presume that if a HR group were to come into existence and was not chartered by a reasonable number of orgs, then the Board would not agree to the "semi-binding" nature of the outcomes (forgive me inventing a new word to describe the CCWG-Board process previously agreed to).
>>> 
>>> Alan
>>> 
>>> At 05/02/2016 01:52 AM, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
>>>> Hello Alan,
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> >>  I don't understand the concept of a Cross Community WG chartered by only one AC/SO.
>>>> 
>>>> Good pick up.   Might be best described as "two or more",  or "at least three" if you want a minimum threshold.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Bruce Tonkin
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community>_______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160208/fbfeabc0/attachment.html>