[CCWG-ACCT] Recommendation 6 and a way forward to include compromise text suggested by the Board

Kavouss Arasteh kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Tue Feb 9 08:57:46 UTC 2016

Dear Leon,
We are almost  drafting Bylawy which should be a very high level text .
référence  on whether the existing CCWG or another CCWG could carry out the
We do not need to enter or refer to  such degree of détails.
I there is of strong believe that the part dealing with one or more SO/AC
ias highlighted below  is not necessary and thus should be deleted +

"by one or more Supporting Organizations or Advisory Committees"



2016-02-09 9:39 GMT+01:00 Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au>:

> Hello Alan,
> >>   I cannot see having the ICANN Bylaws refer to a specific CCWG or a
> sub-part thereof. If they need to make a reference such as the one we are
> discussing, they should say the work will be carried out by an
> appropriately chartered, generally/widely supported, cross community
> working group.
> Makes sense to me.
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160209/e7959710/attachment.html>

More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list