[CCWG-ACCT] Board comments on Board removal in the context of GAC advice

Kavouss Arasteh kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Sat Feb 13 17:29:19 UTC 2016

No Malcolm
The Board just reminding that for the removal of the entire Board consensus agreement of 4 SO/AC is required .
However, for cases that Board removal is invoked as results of action taken in regard with GAC advice and based in the recent compromise GAC is excluded from exercising its community power then there would remain 4
SO/AC for decision making then either 4 must agree or one objection criteria is used only 3 agreement would remain which does not meet the criteria of 4 in favour and not more than against 
That is all

Sent from my iPhone

> On 13 Feb 2016, at 17:17, Malcolm Hutty <malcolm at linx.net> wrote:
> Sent from my iPhone
>> On 13 Feb 2016, at 16:12, Malcolm Hutty <malcolm at linx.net> wrote:
>> What you are proposing would allow the GAC to participate in that decision
> Or have I misunderstood? Was your proposed qualification limited only to qualifying Board removal power, not the other community powers?
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list