[CCWG-ACCT] Board comments on Board removal in the context of GAC advice

Kavouss Arasteh kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Sat Feb 13 22:16:43 UTC 2016


Dear Leon
Yes, everybody understood it as you did
Regards
Kavouss 

Sent from my iPhone

> On 13 Feb 2016, at 20:37, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe at sanchez.mx> wrote:
> 
> Dear Malcolm,
> 
> As I read it, and please, Bruce, correct me if I’m wrong, this only refers to whole Board removal power and not the rest of community powers so it would leave compromise language intact but clarifying the point in Rec 2 to this end.
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> 
> León
> 
>> El 13/02/2016, a las 10:17 a.m., Malcolm Hutty <malcolm at linx.net> escribió:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On 13 Feb 2016, at 16:12, Malcolm Hutty <malcolm at linx.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> What you are proposing would allow the GAC to participate in that decision
>> 
>> Or have I misunderstood? Was your proposed qualification limited only to qualifying Board removal power, not the other community powers?
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list