[CCWG-ACCT] Board comments on Board removal in the context of GAC advice

Paul Rosenzweig paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
Wed Feb 17 13:01:42 UTC 2016

Oh come on EL.  We all know you are clairvoyant.  Write it for the proposal
you know =will be = adopted ....:-)

Paul Rosenzweig
paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com 
O: +1 (202) 547-0660
M: +1 (202) 329-9650
VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739
Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066
Link to my PGP Key

-----Original Message-----
From: Dr Eberhard W Lisse [mailto:el at lisse.NA] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 7:41 AM
To: paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com; egmorris1 at toast.net;
Brett.Schaefer at heritage.org
Cc: el at lisse.NA; accountability-cross-community at icann.org
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Board comments on Board removal in the context of
GAC advice

No wonder the time line doesn't work, I have no clue how I can write a
Minority Report on a Final Report which is not Final.

Let me just go on record with the formal objection in case we poll.


On 2016-02-17 14:27, Paul Rosenzweig wrote:
> Dear Co-Chairs
> Now you have a problem.  A significant number of us do NOT agree with 
> the Board's proposed modification of the spill power post-Board 
> acceptance of GAC advice.  A number of others apparently do agree with 
> this further change from the closed text of Rec 1.  It appears as 
> though the supplementary proposal is not complete.  I, personally, 
> would take what was in the compromise proposal - the same "all but one 
> objecting SO/AC" standard - that is in the current draft (which, I 
> note, has not been released).
> If you are going to think about changing the draft (as you are free to 
> do), I would respectfully request a full proposal fromteh Board (text 
> and justirifcation); two readings; and the development of consensus 
> one-way or the other.  We should not adopt the Board's proposal at all 
> - but if we do, it should not be in this higgledy piggledy haphazard 
> way of having the Board liason communicate an idea that is only 
> clarified in email converations.
> Where is the redline text?  And when is the consideration?
> Paul
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse  \        / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
el at lisse.NA            / *     |   Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421             \     /
Bachbrecht, Namibia     ;____/

More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list