[CCWG-ACCT] CCWG ACCT Proposed Agenda - Call #84 - Tuesday, 16 February @ 06:00 UTC

Kavouss Arasteh kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Wed Feb 17 20:29:47 UTC 2016

Tks for explanation.
This means that Under those circumstances that ICANN Bylaws and /or Article
of Incorporation isnot violated , the Board is Under the mercy of the SO/AC
That is a very shaky and uncertain situation since just those SO and AC may
for any unjustified reasons get together and Spill over the Board
That is what the community wants ?

2016-02-17 20:22 GMT+01:00 Malcolm Hutty <malcolm at linx.net>:

> +1
> Sent from my iDevice; please excuse terseness and typos.
> > On 17 Feb 2016, at 17:14, Burr, Becky <Becky.Burr at neustar.biz> wrote:
> >
> > My view is that the Board’s position is reasonable where an IRP is
> available, and unreasonable in those situations – perhaps highly unusual
> but nonetheless conceivable – where the grounds for recall do not rest on
> an allegation that it has violated the Bylaws/Articles.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160217/a9ae12f1/attachment.html>

More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list