[CCWG-ACCT] report and next steps

Fri Feb 19 17:02:01 UTC 2016

Kavouss,

You seem determined to make an issue here. I sent you that note off-list after you sent a flurry of e-mails that were duplicative, garbled and/or directed at the wrong people. I see nothing wrong with suggesting in a private note that you take a short break. I am disappointed that you saw the need to make this public.

Best,

Brett

From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Kavouss Arasteh
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 11:52 AM
To: Phil Corwin
Cc: Thomas Rickert; Accountability Cross Community
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] report and next steps

Dear Brett,
Pls be kind and observe the ethic.of communication
This is not a correct  to say in an e-mail to others
Quote
"The only one getting wound up here is you. I suggest you take a breath and focus on other matters for an hour or so".
Unquote
If you wish I can reply you in the same manner as you did.
It is Friday and I wish you a very Niced Week-end
Regards
Kavouss

2016-02-19 17:24 GMT+01:00 Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com<mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>>:
Dear All
I am not responsible to make any statistic on the issue.
However, I have seen messages from Russia, Benin and Mali expressing support.
However,I am not here to judge any thing but just draw your attention to the natter.
Pls ask others to comment and not me
Tks
Kavouss

Sent from my iPhone

On 19 Feb 2016, at 17:14, Phil Corwin <psc at vlaw-dc.com<mailto:psc at vlaw-dc.com>> wrote:
I note that Iran did not endorse the statement -- and would be interested in knowing whether it was not asked, or was asked and declined.

Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597<tel:202-559-8597>/Direct
202-559-8750<tel:202-559-8750>/Fax
202-255-6172<tel:202-255-6172>/cell

Twitter: @VlawDC

"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey

From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Paul Rosenzweig
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 11:06 AM
To: 'Kavouss Arasteh'
Cc: 'Thomas Rickert'; 'Accountability Cross Community'
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] report and next steps

Dear Kavous

Just so we are clear – so what?  There are thousands of people who have never attended the CCWG calls.  More or less having failed to do so is on them ….

In any event here is the list of people who joined Olga’s statement, annotated

Argentina – attended CCWG and filed comments
Brazil --  attended CCWG and filed comments
Chile
France – filed comments
Paraguay
Peru
Portugal – attended CCWG and filed comments
Uruguay
Venezuela

So, essentially, you are arguing that because 5 countries have now joined a position held by 4 others we should take note or reopen the discussion.  We should not.  They are free to express disappointment in solidarity with their colleagues if they like, but it doesn’t change the process or the result.

Paul

Paul Rosenzweig
paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com<mailto:paul.rosenzweigesq at redbranchconsulting.com>
O: +1 (202) 547-0660<tel:%2B1%20%28202%29%20547-0660>
M: +1 (202) 329-9650<tel:%2B1%20%28202%29%20329-9650>
VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739<tel:%2B1%20%28202%29%20738-1739>
Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066
Link to my PGP Key<http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=19&Itemid=9>
<image001.png><http://www.rsaconference.com/events/us16?utm_source=signature&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=speakers-us2016>

From: Kavouss Arasteh [mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 10:30 AM
To: Paul Rosenzweig <paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com<mailto:paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com>>
Cc: Schaefer, Brett <Brett.Schaefer at heritage.org<mailto:Brett.Schaefer at heritage.org>>; Thomas Rickert <thomas at rickert.net<mailto:thomas at rickert.net>>; Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] report and next steps

Dear Brett
I am not making any attempt. I have just drawing attention to the concerns expressed by these countries some of which never attended CCWG calls .
Take it as it is and please do not accuse me to reopening any thing at all
The issue is there
Regards
Kavousd

Sent from my iPhone

On 19 Feb 2016, at 15:37, Paul Rosenzweig <paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com<mailto:paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com>> wrote:
Dear Kavous

Theres is not “growing” concern.  These same countries were all quite vocal earlier, both in the CCWG and in their public comments.  Their view has not prevailed.  If it had, then then the gNSO would have rejected the proposal

Your attempts to reopen settled decisions by portraying old information as new are, frankly, illegitimate and disturbing.

Paul

Paul Rosenzweig
paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com<mailto:paul.rosenzweigesq at redbranchconsulting.com>
O: +1 (202) 547-0660<tel:%2B1%20%28202%29%20547-0660>
M: +1 (202) 329-9650<tel:%2B1%20%28202%29%20329-9650>
VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739<tel:%2B1%20%28202%29%20738-1739>
Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066
Link to my PGP Key<http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=19&Itemid=9>
<image001.png><http://www.rsaconference.com/events/us16?utm_source=signature&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=speakers-us2016>

From: Kavouss Arasteh [mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 9:31 AM
To: Schaefer, Brett <Brett.Schaefer at heritage.org<mailto:Brett.Schaefer at heritage.org>>
Cc: Thomas Rickert <thomas at rickert.net<mailto:thomas at rickert.net>>; Accountability Cross Community <accountability-cross-community at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] report and next steps

Dear Brett
Pls DO NOT make any interpretation of my message.
I just informed of the growing concerns tabled
That is all
Regards
Ksvousd

Sent from my iPhone

On 19 Feb 2016, at 15:17, Schaefer, Brett <Brett.Schaefer at heritage.org<mailto:Brett.Schaefer at heritage.org>> wrote:
Kavouss,

So that means that over 130 governments declined to join or support that statement in whole or in part?

Thanks,

Brett

________________________________
Brett Schaefer
Jay Kingham Senior Research Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs
Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom Davis Institute for National Security and Foreign Policy
The Heritage Foundation
214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE
Washington, DC 20002
202-608-6097<tel:202-608-6097>
heritage.org<http://heritage.org/>
From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Kavouss Arasteh
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 8:26 AM
To: Thomas Rickert
Cc: Accountability Cross Community
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] report and next steps

Dear Thomas,
After the Minority Statement posted by Olga as a Member of CCWG who is eligible to make such statement ,10 more GAC directly or indirectly joined joined / supported that statement.This is an important development of the serious concerns tabled in regard with ST18, threshold for the GAC advice rejection by Board and more importantly Carve-Out concept.
There would therefore a need to reflect in the Report the existence of such serious concerns and the increasing supports for the concerns raised by Olga.
Some other GAC governments who are not Member of CCWG could probably join to the concerns tabled by Olga.
That eventual evolution could also be  mentioned in the report to inform other chartering organisation when they receive the REPORT
TKS
KAVOUSD

Sent from my iPhone

On 17 Feb 2016, at 22:09, Thomas Rickert <thomas at rickert.net<mailto:thomas at rickert.net>> wrote:
Dear CCWG-Accountability,

We wanted to inform you that the revisions have been made from the comments that have been received from the lawyers, several community members, and from the 16 February call. These have been incorporated into the sections that were noted. The graphics are being revised and will be placed in the final version of the text per the suggestions that have been submitted to date.

The revised sections have been posted at https://community.icann.org/x/iw2AAw<https://community.icann.org/x/iw2AAw> for your final review. We have also posted a documents that tracks all the comments — and subsequent changes made — between the 12 February and 17 February documents.

The schedule presented on the 16 February call that we are following to conclude our current work on Work Stream 1 has been updated.

12 Feb — Report sent by 22:00 UTC to the CCWG Leadership Team and CCWG Legal Counsel for review with all materials posted on the Wiki (https://community.icann.org/x/iw2AAw<https://community.icann.org/x/iw2AAw>) for everyone to view.

15 Feb — Report updated (if needed) to incorporate edits from CCWG Leadership Team and Legal.

17 Feb— Report sent to CCWG for 48-hour review (and posted on the Wiki at https://community.icann.org/x/iw2AAw<https://community.icann.org/x/iw2AAw>).

To ensure that all comments from our CCWG Leadership Team and Legal counsel were accurately incorporated for the full group review period, distribution to the CCWG was updated to 17 Feb. To maintain the 48-hour review period, all subsequent proposal finalization dates have been extended one day. All other dates have been retained.

18 Feb at 17:00 UTC – Minority statements due for incorporation into Final Report.

19 Feb – Final Report sent to Chartering Organizations for consideration and approval.

Once the Final Report is in the hands of your organizations, these are the expected dates for the final steps, as we discussed on the Transition Program Facilitation<https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/transition-facilitation-2015-09-23-en> call this past Tuesday:

25 Feb – CWG-Stewardship sign-off letter delivered to Chartering Organizations, then to ICG.

By 9 Mar at the latest – Sign-off on Final Report by Chartering Organizations at ICANN55 in Marrakech (in time for the Board to consider).

10 Mar – Public Board Meeting and hand over from ICANN Board to NTIA.

Based on the updated schedule, minority statements must be submitted no later than 18 February at 17:00 UTC to allow for the final supplemental proposal to be produced and ready for distribution to the Chartering Organizations on 19 February.

If you have any questions about our timeline or suggestions for our process, please let us know how we can assist.

Sincerely,
Mathieu, León and Thomas
CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs

________________________________
Brett Schaefer
Jay Kingham Senior Research Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs
Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom Davis Institute for National Security and Foreign Policy
The Heritage Foundation
214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE
Washington, DC 20002
202-608-6097
heritage.org<http://heritage.org/>
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community<https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community>
________________________________
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com>
Version: 2016.0.7303 / Virus Database: 4530/11623 - Release Date: 02/14/16

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160219/ddeb1838/attachment-0001.html>