[CCWG-ACCT] Carve-out issue

Kavouss Arasteh kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Fri Feb 19 17:22:56 UTC 2016

Please kindly confirm and acknowledge recipt of wanrning message

2016-02-19 18:10 GMT+01:00 Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>:

> Dear Co-chairs
> You have seen the concerns of 11 Governments which would certainly be
> echoed by other gouvernements soon.
> If there is no consensus means there is no consensus ,
> We could not favour one community in disfavouring another one.
> Perhaps it was hoped that the people could join the consensus but it does
> not come up as such
> If a mistake has occurred we should repair it .
> Howmany times we have changed our concept from Voluntry Model to Sole
> member from Sole Member to Sole designator .
> Pls do not rush to publish the report as being sent to the chartering
> organization just hold on for few more days untill your 26 feb. calls
> Try to find out some solution including going back to the initial stage of
> REC. 11 without no carve-out and with two options of simple majority and
> 2/3 theshold  and rediscuss that.
> You can not ignor the growing concerns of several governments and would
> certainly be further grown up soon
> Regards
> Kavouss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160219/d63cf1a3/attachment.html>

More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list