[CCWG-ACCT] GAC Processes

Sat Feb 20 11:06:15 UTC 2016

That is good, but not the same as transparent.

el

On 20 Feb 2016, 12:45 +0200, Kavouss Arasteh<kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>, wrote:
> Dear All,
> Yes we have asked that any consensus advice or other advice be accompanied with " rationale" and be clear , precise and concise
> Regards
> Kavouss
> 
> 
> 2016-02-20 11:31 GMT+01:00<epilisse at gmail.com(mailto:epilisse at gmail.com)>:
> > Becky, Jordan
> > 
> > please remind me, did we encourage the GAC in any way to be transparent in their advice to the Board (requiring special attention)? Or is Consensus our only requirement?
> > 
> > el
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> > Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org(mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org)
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> > 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160220/462617b6/attachment.html>