[CCWG-ACCT] Board position re the GAC carve out
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Sun Feb 21 17:29:47 UTC 2016
+1. In the VERY edge case that we are considering, and the onerous
implications of removing the Board, I have no problem whatsoever
requiring unanimity of the remaining AC/SOs.
At 20/02/2016 12:14 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
>On 19-Feb-16 19:41, Paul Rosenzweig wrote:
> > I suspect to
> > most if not all of the gNSO.
>not all. I think Steve's comments were reasonable.
>Since it was a compromise I stayed away from the discussion of carves
>out, which have been a somewhat flawed idea from the start in my opinion.
>I think making a concession on the unanimity rule in this one case is
>This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community