[CCWG-ACCT] A message from the Co-Chairs

Andrew Sullivan ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
Sun Feb 21 22:38:16 UTC 2016


On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 10:12:57PM +0100, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
> *Consequently the so-called special privilege repeatedly referred to  by
> others would in fact very rarely happens *

In that case, of course, the carve-out doesn't take effect anyway.  So
if this is in fact to be so rare, why would anyone argue that it needs
to be changed?  The argument, "Such-and-thus effect is never going to
happen, so we must set up the procedures around it perfectly," doesn't
really seem to hang together.

Best regards,


Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com

More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list