[CCWG-ACCT] A message from the Co-Chairs
jordan at internetnz.net.nz
Sun Feb 21 23:05:05 UTC 2016
That is the situation today. Why would advice be any more or less likely
than it is today?
On 22 February 2016 at 12:03, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
> I am sorry, you missed the point that I raised
> The point was ,with ST18, the GAC will totally be disabled to agree on
> such consensus ADVICE as one single government could always oppose to
> the Advice. This was purposely injected in the Recommendation
> That is the meaning of rare advice.
> Pls kindly read the text as it MEANT and kindly not turn it around
> Kavouss .
> 2016-02-21 23:38 GMT+01:00 Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>:
>> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 10:12:57PM +0100, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
>> > *Consequently the so-called special privilege repeatedly referred to by
>> > others would in fact very rarely happens *
>> In that case, of course, the carve-out doesn't take effect anyway. So
>> if this is in fact to be so rare, why would anyone argue that it needs
>> to be changed? The argument, "Such-and-thus effect is never going to
>> happen, so we must set up the procedures around it perfectly," doesn't
>> really seem to hang together.
>> Best regards,
>> Andrew Sullivan
>> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
*InternetNZ - your voice for the Open Internet*
+64-4-495-2118 (office) | +64-21-442-649 (mob)
Email: jordan at internetnz.net.nz
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community