[CCWG-ACCT] Poll results

Nigel Roberts nigel at channelisles.net
Tue Feb 23 11:38:52 UTC 2016


Useful and interesting.

Now, please, what does it mean?


On 23/02/16 10:26, Grace Abuhamad wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> To ensure full transparency around the polling, the staff have reviewed
> the recording for the call and crosschecked the results. The Adobe
> Connect recording is available here for your viewing as well:
> https://icann.adobeconnect.com/p2ner13u4kd/.
>
> Please note that the instructions regarding participation in the polls
> were as follows:
>
> ·Anyone on the call was invited to participate in the poll (members &
> participants).
>
> ·To participate, participants in the Adobe Connect room used either a
> red or green tick to respond to the poll question.
>
> ·Those on audio-only could express their position over the phone.
>
> ·After the polls, analysis would be conducted to assess participation
> from CCWG members (for the purposes of these results, the members’ names
> are in bold font).
>
> The Chairs conducted four polls in a group that varied between 85-90
> participants. The text used as the basis for the polls is Paragraph 72
> of the CCWG report (see attached slide for the text as well as the 2^nd
> bullet highlighted in red). The first two poll questions were based on
> objections and the second two poll questions were based on expressions
> of support.
>
>
> *Summary of results: *
>
> ·11 objections to removing the 2^nd bullet in Paragraph 72 (in red on
> the slide)
>
> o(2 CCWG member objections)
>
> ·27 objections to sending the report forward as it is currently, with
> the full text in Paragraph 72
>
> o(8 CCWG member objections, including all ALAC members)
>
> ·36 support removing the language in the 2^nd bullet in Paragraph 72 (in
> red on the slide)
>
> o(10 CCWG members supporting)
>
> ·14 support sending the report forward as it is currently, with the full
> text in Paragraph 72
>
> o(2 CCWG members supporting)
>
>
> *Detailed results: *
>
> *Poll #1*– Who objects to removing the 2^nd bullet in Paragraph 72 (in
> red on the slide), (“If the IRP is not available to challenge the Board
> action in question”)?
>
> 1.Brett Schaefer (NCSG – Participant)
>
> 2.Edward Morris (NCSG – Participant)
>
> 3.Farzaneh Badii (NCSG – Participant)
>
> 4.James Gannon (NCSG – Participant)
>
> 5.Malcolm Hutty (ISPCP – Participant)
>
> 6.Milton Mueller (NCSG – Participant)
>
> 7.Paul Rosenzweig (NCSG – Participant)
>
> 8.*Robin Gross*(NCSG – Member)
>
> 9.Stephen Deerhake (ccNSO – Participant)
>
> 10.Tatiana Tropina (NCSG – Participant)
>
> 11.*Eberhard Lisse*(ccNSO – Member)
>
> *Poll #2*– Who objects to sending the report forward (to Chartering
> Organizations) as it is currently, (i.e. the 19 February version with
> the full text in Paragraph 72)?
>
> 1.*Alan Greenberg*(ALAC – Member)
>
> 2.Asha Hemrajani (ICANN Board – Participant)
>
> 3.Cherine Chalaby (ICANN Board – Participant)
>
> 4.*Cheryl Langdon-Orr*(ALAC – Member)
>
> 5.Chris Disspain (ICANN Board – Participant)
>
> 6.David McAuley (GNSO – Participant)
>
> 7.Fadi Chehade (ICANN Board – Participant)
>
> 8.George Sadowsky (ICANN Board – Participant)
>
> 9.Jorge Cancio (GAC – Participant)
>
> 10.*Julia Wolman*(GAC – Member)
>
> 11.Keith Drazek (RySG – Participant)
>
> 12.*Leon Sanchez*(ALAC – Member)
>
> 13.Lito Ibarra (ICANN Board – Participant)
>
> 14.Louisewies Van del Laan (ICANN Board – Participant)
>
> 15.Markus Kummer (ICANN Board – Participant)
>
> 16.*Olga Cavalli*(GAC – Member)
>
> 17.Olivier Crepin-Leblond (ALAC – Participant)
>
> 18.Pedro da Silva (GAC – Participant)
>
> 19.Rafael Perez Galindo (GAC – Participant)
>
> 20.Rinalia Abdul Rahim (ICANN Board – Participant)
>
> 21.*Roelof Meijer*(ccNSO – Member)
>
> 22.Ron da Silva (ICANN Board – Participant)
>
> 23.Samantha Eisner (ICANN Staff Liaison)
>
> 24.Seun Ojedeji (ALAC – Participant)
>
> 25.Steve Crocker (ICANN Board – Participant)
>
> 26.*Sebastien Bachollet*(ALAC – Member)
>
> 27.Stephen Deerhake (ccNSO – Participant)
>
> 28.Tarek Kamel (ICANN Staff – Participant)
>
> 29.*Tijani Ben Jemaa*(ALAC – Member)
>
> *Poll #3*– Who supports removing the language in the 2^nd bullet in
> Paragraph 72 (in red on the slide), (“If the IRP is not available to
> challenge the Board action in question”)?
>
> 1.*Alan**Greenberg* (ALAC – Member)
>
> 2.Annaliese Williams (GAC – Participant)
>
> 3.Asha Hemrajani (ICANN Board – Participant)
>
> 4.Avri Doria (NCSG – Participant)
>
> 5.Cherine Chalaby (ICANN Board – Participant)
>
> 6.*Cheryl Langdon-Orr*(ALAC – Member)
>
> 7.Chris Disspain (ICANN Board – Participant)
>
> 8.David McAuley (GNSO – Participant)
>
> 9.Fadi Chehade (ICANN Board – Participant)
>
> 10.Finn Petersen (GAC – Participant)
>
> 11.George Sadowsky (ICANN Board – Participant)
>
> 12.Greg Shatan (IPC – Participant)
>
> 13.*James Bladel*(RrSG – Member)
>
> 14.*Julia**Wolman* (GAC – Member)
>
> 15.Kavouss Arasteh (GAC – Participant)
>
> 16.Keith Drazek (RySG – Participant)
>
> 17.*Leon**Sanchez* (ALAC – Member)
>
> 18.Lito Ibarra (ICANN Board – Participant)
>
> 19.Louisewies Van del Laan (ICANN Board – Participant)
>
> 20.Mark Carvell (GAC – Participant)
>
> 21.Markus Kummer (ICANN Board – Participant)
>
> 22.Mary Uduma (ccNSO – Participant)
>
> 23.Niels Ten Oever (Participant)
>
> 30.*Olga**Cavalli* (GAC – Member)
>
> 24.Olivier Crepin-Leblond (ALAC – Participant)
>
> 25.Paul Szyndler (ccNSO – Participant)
>
> 26.Pedro da Silva (GAC – Participant)
>
> 31.Rafael Perez Galindo (GAC – Participant)
>
> 27.Rinalia Abdul Rahim (ICANN Board – Participant)
>
> 28.*Roelof**Meijer* (ccNSO – Member)
>
> 29.Ron da Silva (ICANN Board – Participant)
>
> 30.Sabine Meyer (GAC – Participant)
>
> 31.Seun Ojedeji (ALAC – Participant)
>
> 32.Steve Crocker (ICANN Board – Participant)
>
> 33.*Steve DelBianco*(CSG – Member)
>
> 34.*Sebastien**Bachollet* (ALAC – Member)
>
> 35.Tarek Kamel (ICANN Staff)
>
> 36.*Tijani**Ben Jemaa* (ALAC – Member)
>
> *Poll #4*– Who supports sending the report to Chartering Organizations
> as it is currently, (i.e. the 19 February version with the full text in
> Paragraph 72)?
>
> 1.Aarti Bhavana (NCSG – Participant)
>
> 2.Brett Schaefer (NCSG – Participant)
>
> 3.Edward Morris (NCSG – Participant)
>
> 4.Farzaneh Badii (NCSG – Participant)
>
> 5.James Gannon (NCSG – Participant)
>
> 6.*Jordan Carter*(ccNSO – Member)
>
> 7.Martin Boyle (ccNSO – Participant)
>
> 8.Matthew Shears (NCSG – Participant)
>
> 9.Malcolm Hutty (ISPCP – Participant)
>
> 10.Milton Mueller (NCSG – Participant)
>
> 11.Paul Rosenzweig (NCSG – Participant)
>
> 12.*Robin**Gross* (NCSG – Member)
>
> 13.Stephen Deerhake (ccNSO – Participant)
>
> 14.Tatiana Tropina (NCSG – Participant)
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list