[CCWG-ACCT] Poll results

[Nigel Roberts]

Kavouss

With respect, that is simply not true. The Charter is clear on this, and 
distinguishes Members, Participants and Observers.

On 23/02/16 13:18, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
> I support the participation of the Board's membrés as participants of
> CCWG .Why they should be excluded.
> ONCE AGAIN PARTICIPANTS ARE THOSE WHO ARE NOT FORMAL MEMBERS OF CCWG
> Regards
> Kavouss
>
> 2016-02-23 13:30 GMT+01:00 Nigel Roberts <nigel at channelisles.net
> <mailto:nigel at channelisles.net>>:
>
>     I do not speak to the merits of the Board's objection. There may be
>     something of a point (or there may not).
>
>     But procedurally, it is very unfortunate.
>
>     The Board should consider whether it really wants to sink the ship
>     over a ha'porth of tar.
>
>
>
>
>     On 23/02/16 12:25, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
>
>         So have your colleagues on the Board pull their objection.
>
>
>         el
>
>         On 2016-02-23 14:16, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" wrote:
>
>             My only recommendation to all parties is please, be flexible
>             enough
>             to find a fair compromise to enable moving forward.  You
>             have agreed
>             99 %.  It would be a shame if in the last minute a remaining
>             controversial issue blocks the historical agreement.
>
>             Wolfgang
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>     Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>     <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>