[CCWG-ACCT] Poll results

Tue Feb 23 13:48:38 UTC 2016

Where it leaves us, I think is clear. We just follow our common practice:
if we have no (rough) consensus on inserting a particular clause or
solution in our proposal, we do not put it in. Item (2) was inserted a few
weeks ago, we do not have anything close to rough consensus to support
that. So it should be taken out.

Best,

Roelof

On 23-02-16 12:39, "accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org on
behalf of Dr Eberhard W Lisse"
<accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org on behalf of
el at lisse.na> wrote:

>Grace,
>
>thank you.
>
>Dear Co-Chairs,
>
>As mentioned in the chat I had to leave after one hour (of which 22
>were taken by a summary, for which I expected an Executive Summary of
>2 minutes or less, by the way) as I have to work for a living.
>
>Just for the record, sending it to the SOs is not the same as
>supporting it, hence your careful language reflects my proxy with the
>exception of Poll 4 where he only polled as participant but should
>have also polled my member proxy in favor of submitting as is.
>
>That said, it is disturbing that 11 Board members and even staff
>participated in the poll.
>
>Never mind the expected outcome from the ACs.
>
>It is however clear that we do NOT have Consensus as required by our
>Charter.
>
>So, where does this leave us?
>
>el
>
>
>On 2016-02-23 12:26, Grace Abuhamad wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> To ensure full transparency around the polling, the staff have
>> reviewed the recording for the call and crosschecked the results.
>> The Adobe Connect recording is available here for your viewing as
>> well: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/p2ner13u4kd/.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Please note that the instructions regarding participation in the polls
>> were as follows:
>> 
>> ·      Anyone on the call was invited to participate in the poll
>> (members & participants).
>> 
>> ·      To participate, participants in the Adobe Connect room used
>> either a red or green tick to respond to the poll question.
>> 
>> ·      Those on audio-only could express their position over the phone.
>> 
>> ·      After the polls, analysis would be conducted to assess
>> participation from CCWG members (for the purposes of these results, the
>> members¹ names are in bold font).
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> The Chairs conducted four polls in a group that varied between 85-90
>> participants.  The text used as the basis for the polls is Paragraph
>> 72 of the CCWG report (see attached slide for the text as well as
>> the 2^nd bullet highlighted in red).  The first two poll questions
>> were based on objections and the second two poll questions were
>> based on expressions of support.
>> 
>> 
>> *Summary of results: *
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> ·      11 objections to removing the 2^nd bullet in Paragraph 72 (in red
>> on the slide)
>> 
>> o   (2 CCWG member objections)
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> ·      27 objections to sending the report forward as it is currently,
>> with the full text in Paragraph 72
>> 
>> o   (8 CCWG member objections, including all ALAC members)
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> ·      36 support removing the language in the 2^nd bullet in Paragraph
>> 72 (in red on the slide)
>> 
>> o   (10 CCWG members supporting)
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> ·      14 support sending the report forward as it is currently, with
>> the full text in Paragraph 72
>> 
>> o   (2 CCWG members supporting)
>> 
>> 
>> *Detailed results: *
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> *Poll #1* Who objects to removing the 2^nd bullet in Paragraph 72 (in
>> red on the slide), (³If the IRP is not available to challenge the Board
>> action in question²)?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 1.    Brett Schaefer (NCSG  Participant)
>> 
>> 2.    Edward Morris (NCSG  Participant)
>> 
>> 3.    Farzaneh Badii (NCSG  Participant)
>> 
>> 4.    James Gannon (NCSG  Participant)
>> 
>> 5.    Malcolm Hutty (ISPCP  Participant)
>> 
>> 6.    Milton Mueller (NCSG  Participant)
>> 
>> 7.    Paul Rosenzweig (NCSG  Participant)
>> 
>> 8.    *Robin Gross*(NCSG  Member)
>> 
>> 9.    Stephen Deerhake (ccNSO  Participant)
>> 
>> 10.Tatiana Tropina (NCSG  Participant)
>> 
>> 11.*Eberhard Lisse*(ccNSO  Member)
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> *Poll #2* Who objects to sending the report forward (to Chartering
>> Organizations) as it is currently, (i.e. the 19 February version with
>> the full text in Paragraph 72)?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 1.    *Alan Greenberg*(ALAC  Member)
>> 
>> 2.    Asha Hemrajani (ICANN Board  Participant)
>> 
>> 3.    Cherine Chalaby (ICANN Board  Participant)
>> 
>> 4.    *Cheryl Langdon-Orr*(ALAC  Member)
>> 
>> 5.    Chris Disspain (ICANN Board  Participant)
>> 
>> 6.    David McAuley (GNSO  Participant)
>> 
>> 7.    Fadi Chehade (ICANN Board  Participant)
>> 
>> 8.    George Sadowsky (ICANN Board  Participant)
>> 
>> 9.    Jorge Cancio (GAC  Participant)
>> 
>> 10.*Julia Wolman*(GAC  Member)
>> 
>> 11.Keith Drazek (RySG  Participant)
>> 
>> 12.*Leon Sanchez*(ALAC  Member)
>> 
>> 13.Lito Ibarra (ICANN Board  Participant)
>> 
>> 14.Louisewies Van del Laan (ICANN Board  Participant)
>> 
>> 15.Markus Kummer (ICANN Board  Participant)
>> 
>> 16.*Olga Cavalli*(GAC  Member)
>> 
>> 17.Olivier Crepin-Leblond (ALAC  Participant)
>> 
>> 18.Pedro da Silva (GAC  Participant)
>> 
>> 19.Rafael Perez Galindo (GAC  Participant)
>> 
>> 20.Rinalia Abdul Rahim (ICANN Board  Participant)
>> 
>> 21.*Roelof Meijer*(ccNSO  Member)
>> 
>> 22.Ron da Silva (ICANN Board  Participant)
>> 
>> 23.Samantha Eisner (ICANN Staff Liaison)
>> 
>> 24.Seun Ojedeji (ALAC  Participant)
>> 
>> 25.Steve Crocker (ICANN Board  Participant)
>> 
>> 26.*Sebastien Bachollet*(ALAC  Member)
>> 
>> 27.Stephen Deerhake (ccNSO  Participant)
>> 
>> 28.Tarek Kamel (ICANN Staff  Participant)
>> 
>> 29.*Tijani Ben Jemaa*(ALAC  Member)
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> *Poll #3* Who supports removing the language in the 2^nd bullet in
>> Paragraph 72 (in red on the slide), (³If the IRP is not available to
>> challenge the Board action in question²)?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 1.    *Alan**Greenberg* (ALAC  Member)
>> 
>> 2.    Annaliese Williams (GAC  Participant)
>> 
>> 3.    Asha Hemrajani (ICANN Board  Participant)
>> 
>> 4.    Avri Doria (NCSG  Participant)
>> 
>> 5.    Cherine Chalaby (ICANN Board  Participant)
>> 
>> 6.    *Cheryl Langdon-Orr*(ALAC  Member)
>> 
>> 7.    Chris Disspain (ICANN Board  Participant)
>> 
>> 8.    David McAuley (GNSO  Participant)
>> 
>> 9.    Fadi Chehade (ICANN Board  Participant)
>> 
>> 10.Finn Petersen (GAC  Participant)
>> 
>> 11.George Sadowsky (ICANN Board  Participant)
>> 
>> 12.Greg Shatan (IPC  Participant)
>> 
>> 13.*James Bladel*(RrSG  Member)
>> 
>> 14.*Julia**Wolman* (GAC  Member)
>> 
>> 15.Kavouss Arasteh (GAC  Participant)
>> 
>> 16.Keith Drazek (RySG  Participant)
>> 
>> 17.*Leon**Sanchez* (ALAC  Member)
>> 
>> 18.Lito Ibarra (ICANN Board  Participant)
>> 
>> 19.Louisewies Van del Laan (ICANN Board  Participant)
>> 
>> 20.Mark Carvell (GAC  Participant)
>> 
>> 21.Markus Kummer (ICANN Board  Participant)
>> 
>> 22.Mary Uduma (ccNSO  Participant)
>> 
>> 23.Niels Ten Oever (Participant)
>> 
>> 30.*Olga**Cavalli* (GAC  Member)
>> 
>> 24.Olivier Crepin-Leblond (ALAC  Participant)
>> 
>> 25.Paul Szyndler (ccNSO  Participant)
>> 
>> 26.Pedro da Silva (GAC  Participant)
>> 
>> 31.Rafael Perez Galindo (GAC  Participant)
>> 
>> 27.Rinalia Abdul Rahim (ICANN Board  Participant)
>> 
>> 28.*Roelof**Meijer* (ccNSO  Member)
>> 
>> 29.Ron da Silva (ICANN Board  Participant)
>> 
>> 30.Sabine Meyer (GAC  Participant)
>> 
>> 31.Seun Ojedeji (ALAC  Participant)
>> 
>> 32.Steve Crocker (ICANN Board  Participant)
>> 
>> 33.*Steve DelBianco*(CSG  Member)
>> 
>> 34.*Sebastien**Bachollet* (ALAC  Member)
>> 
>> 35.Tarek Kamel (ICANN Staff)
>> 
>> 36.*Tijani**Ben Jemaa* (ALAC  Member)
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> *Poll #4* Who supports sending the report to Chartering Organizations
>> as it is currently, (i.e. the 19 February version with the full text in
>> Paragraph 72)?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 1.    Aarti Bhavana (NCSG  Participant)
>> 
>> 2.    Brett Schaefer (NCSG  Participant)
>> 
>> 3.    Edward Morris (NCSG  Participant)
>> 
>> 4.    Farzaneh Badii (NCSG  Participant)
>> 
>> 5.    James Gannon (NCSG  Participant)
>> 
>> 6.    *Jordan Carter*(ccNSO  Member)
>> 
>> 7.    Martin Boyle (ccNSO  Participant)
>> 
>> 8.    Matthew Shears (NCSG  Participant)
>> 
>> 9.    Malcolm Hutty (ISPCP  Participant)
>> 
>> 10.Milton Mueller (NCSG  Participant)
>> 
>> 11.Paul Rosenzweig (NCSG  Participant)
>> 
>> 12.*Robin**Gross* (NCSG  Member)
>> 
>> 13.Stephen Deerhake (ccNSO  Participant)
>> 
>> 14.Tatiana Tropina (NCSG  Participant)
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>> 
>
>-- 
>Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse  \        / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
>el at lisse.NA            / *     |   Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
>PO Box 8421             \     /
>Bachbrecht, Namibia     ;____/
>_______________________________________________
>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>