[CCWG-ACCT] Poll results

Tue Feb 23 13:58:38 UTC 2016

+1

On 23-Feb-16 15:48, Roelof Meijer wrote:
> Where it leaves us, I think is clear. We just follow our common practice:
> if we have no (rough) consensus on inserting a particular clause or
> solution in our proposal, we do not put it in. Item (2) was inserted a few
> weeks ago, we do not have anything close to rough consensus to support
> that. So it should be taken out.
>
>
> Best,
>
> Roelof
>
>
>
>
> On 23-02-16 12:39, "accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org on
> behalf of Dr Eberhard W Lisse"
> <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org on behalf of
> el at lisse.na> wrote:
>
>> Grace,
>>
>> thank you.
>>
>> Dear Co-Chairs,
>>
>> As mentioned in the chat I had to leave after one hour (of which 22
>> were taken by a summary, for which I expected an Executive Summary of
>> 2 minutes or less, by the way) as I have to work for a living.
>>
>> Just for the record, sending it to the SOs is not the same as
>> supporting it, hence your careful language reflects my proxy with the
>> exception of Poll 4 where he only polled as participant but should
>> have also polled my member proxy in favor of submitting as is.
>>
>> That said, it is disturbing that 11 Board members and even staff
>> participated in the poll.
>>
>> Never mind the expected outcome from the ACs.
>>
>> It is however clear that we do NOT have Consensus as required by our
>> Charter.
>>
>> So, where does this leave us?
>>
>> el
>>
>>
>> On 2016-02-23 12:26, Grace Abuhamad wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> To ensure full transparency around the polling, the staff have
>>> reviewed the recording for the call and crosschecked the results.
>>> The Adobe Connect recording is available here for your viewing as
>>> well: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/p2ner13u4kd/.
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> Please note that the instructions regarding participation in the polls
>>> were as follows:
>>>
>>> ·      Anyone on the call was invited to participate in the poll
>>> (members & participants).
>>>
>>> ·      To participate, participants in the Adobe Connect room used
>>> either a red or green tick to respond to the poll question.
>>>
>>> ·      Those on audio-only could express their position over the phone.
>>>
>>> ·      After the polls, analysis would be conducted to assess
>>> participation from CCWG members (for the purposes of these results, the
>>> members¹ names are in bold font).
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> The Chairs conducted four polls in a group that varied between 85-90
>>> participants.  The text used as the basis for the polls is Paragraph
>>> 72 of the CCWG report (see attached slide for the text as well as
>>> the 2^nd bullet highlighted in red).  The first two poll questions
>>> were based on objections and the second two poll questions were
>>> based on expressions of support.
>>>
>>>
>>> *Summary of results: *
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> ·      11 objections to removing the 2^nd bullet in Paragraph 72 (in red
>>> on the slide)
>>>
>>> o   (2 CCWG member objections)
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> ·      27 objections to sending the report forward as it is currently,
>>> with the full text in Paragraph 72
>>>
>>> o   (8 CCWG member objections, including all ALAC members)
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> ·      36 support removing the language in the 2^nd bullet in Paragraph
>>> 72 (in red on the slide)
>>>
>>> o   (10 CCWG members supporting)
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> ·      14 support sending the report forward as it is currently, with
>>> the full text in Paragraph 72
>>>
>>> o   (2 CCWG members supporting)
>>>
>>>
>>> *Detailed results: *
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> *Poll #1* Who objects to removing the 2^nd bullet in Paragraph 72 (in
>>> red on the slide), (³If the IRP is not available to challenge the Board
>>> action in question²)?
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> 1.    Brett Schaefer (NCSG  Participant)
>>>
>>> 2.    Edward Morris (NCSG  Participant)
>>>
>>> 3.    Farzaneh Badii (NCSG  Participant)
>>>
>>> 4.    James Gannon (NCSG  Participant)
>>>
>>> 5.    Malcolm Hutty (ISPCP  Participant)
>>>
>>> 6.    Milton Mueller (NCSG  Participant)
>>>
>>> 7.    Paul Rosenzweig (NCSG  Participant)
>>>
>>> 8.    *Robin Gross*(NCSG  Member)
>>>
>>> 9.    Stephen Deerhake (ccNSO  Participant)
>>>
>>> 10.Tatiana Tropina (NCSG  Participant)
>>>
>>> 11.*Eberhard Lisse*(ccNSO  Member)
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> *Poll #2* Who objects to sending the report forward (to Chartering
>>> Organizations) as it is currently, (i.e. the 19 February version with
>>> the full text in Paragraph 72)?
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> 1.    *Alan Greenberg*(ALAC  Member)
>>>
>>> 2.    Asha Hemrajani (ICANN Board  Participant)
>>>
>>> 3.    Cherine Chalaby (ICANN Board  Participant)
>>>
>>> 4.    *Cheryl Langdon-Orr*(ALAC  Member)
>>>
>>> 5.    Chris Disspain (ICANN Board  Participant)
>>>
>>> 6.    David McAuley (GNSO  Participant)
>>>
>>> 7.    Fadi Chehade (ICANN Board  Participant)
>>>
>>> 8.    George Sadowsky (ICANN Board  Participant)
>>>
>>> 9.    Jorge Cancio (GAC  Participant)
>>>
>>> 10.*Julia Wolman*(GAC  Member)
>>>
>>> 11.Keith Drazek (RySG  Participant)
>>>
>>> 12.*Leon Sanchez*(ALAC  Member)
>>>
>>> 13.Lito Ibarra (ICANN Board  Participant)
>>>
>>> 14.Louisewies Van del Laan (ICANN Board  Participant)
>>>
>>> 15.Markus Kummer (ICANN Board  Participant)
>>>
>>> 16.*Olga Cavalli*(GAC  Member)
>>>
>>> 17.Olivier Crepin-Leblond (ALAC  Participant)
>>>
>>> 18.Pedro da Silva (GAC  Participant)
>>>
>>> 19.Rafael Perez Galindo (GAC  Participant)
>>>
>>> 20.Rinalia Abdul Rahim (ICANN Board  Participant)
>>>
>>> 21.*Roelof Meijer*(ccNSO  Member)
>>>
>>> 22.Ron da Silva (ICANN Board  Participant)
>>>
>>> 23.Samantha Eisner (ICANN Staff Liaison)
>>>
>>> 24.Seun Ojedeji (ALAC  Participant)
>>>
>>> 25.Steve Crocker (ICANN Board  Participant)
>>>
>>> 26.*Sebastien Bachollet*(ALAC  Member)
>>>
>>> 27.Stephen Deerhake (ccNSO  Participant)
>>>
>>> 28.Tarek Kamel (ICANN Staff  Participant)
>>>
>>> 29.*Tijani Ben Jemaa*(ALAC  Member)
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> *Poll #3* Who supports removing the language in the 2^nd bullet in
>>> Paragraph 72 (in red on the slide), (³If the IRP is not available to
>>> challenge the Board action in question²)?
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> 1.    *Alan**Greenberg* (ALAC  Member)
>>>
>>> 2.    Annaliese Williams (GAC  Participant)
>>>
>>> 3.    Asha Hemrajani (ICANN Board  Participant)
>>>
>>> 4.    Avri Doria (NCSG  Participant)
>>>
>>> 5.    Cherine Chalaby (ICANN Board  Participant)
>>>
>>> 6.    *Cheryl Langdon-Orr*(ALAC  Member)
>>>
>>> 7.    Chris Disspain (ICANN Board  Participant)
>>>
>>> 8.    David McAuley (GNSO  Participant)
>>>
>>> 9.    Fadi Chehade (ICANN Board  Participant)
>>>
>>> 10.Finn Petersen (GAC  Participant)
>>>
>>> 11.George Sadowsky (ICANN Board  Participant)
>>>
>>> 12.Greg Shatan (IPC  Participant)
>>>
>>> 13.*James Bladel*(RrSG  Member)
>>>
>>> 14.*Julia**Wolman* (GAC  Member)
>>>
>>> 15.Kavouss Arasteh (GAC  Participant)
>>>
>>> 16.Keith Drazek (RySG  Participant)
>>>
>>> 17.*Leon**Sanchez* (ALAC  Member)
>>>
>>> 18.Lito Ibarra (ICANN Board  Participant)
>>>
>>> 19.Louisewies Van del Laan (ICANN Board  Participant)
>>>
>>> 20.Mark Carvell (GAC  Participant)
>>>
>>> 21.Markus Kummer (ICANN Board  Participant)
>>>
>>> 22.Mary Uduma (ccNSO  Participant)
>>>
>>> 23.Niels Ten Oever (Participant)
>>>
>>> 30.*Olga**Cavalli* (GAC  Member)
>>>
>>> 24.Olivier Crepin-Leblond (ALAC  Participant)
>>>
>>> 25.Paul Szyndler (ccNSO  Participant)
>>>
>>> 26.Pedro da Silva (GAC  Participant)
>>>
>>> 31.Rafael Perez Galindo (GAC  Participant)
>>>
>>> 27.Rinalia Abdul Rahim (ICANN Board  Participant)
>>>
>>> 28.*Roelof**Meijer* (ccNSO  Member)
>>>
>>> 29.Ron da Silva (ICANN Board  Participant)
>>>
>>> 30.Sabine Meyer (GAC  Participant)
>>>
>>> 31.Seun Ojedeji (ALAC  Participant)
>>>
>>> 32.Steve Crocker (ICANN Board  Participant)
>>>
>>> 33.*Steve DelBianco*(CSG  Member)
>>>
>>> 34.*Sebastien**Bachollet* (ALAC  Member)
>>>
>>> 35.Tarek Kamel (ICANN Staff)
>>>
>>> 36.*Tijani**Ben Jemaa* (ALAC  Member)
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> *Poll #4* Who supports sending the report to Chartering Organizations
>>> as it is currently, (i.e. the 19 February version with the full text in
>>> Paragraph 72)?
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> 1.    Aarti Bhavana (NCSG  Participant)
>>>
>>> 2.    Brett Schaefer (NCSG  Participant)
>>>
>>> 3.    Edward Morris (NCSG  Participant)
>>>
>>> 4.    Farzaneh Badii (NCSG  Participant)
>>>
>>> 5.    James Gannon (NCSG  Participant)
>>>
>>> 6.    *Jordan Carter*(ccNSO  Member)
>>>
>>> 7.    Martin Boyle (ccNSO  Participant)
>>>
>>> 8.    Matthew Shears (NCSG  Participant)
>>>
>>> 9.    Malcolm Hutty (ISPCP  Participant)
>>>
>>> 10.Milton Mueller (NCSG  Participant)
>>>
>>> 11.Paul Rosenzweig (NCSG  Participant)
>>>
>>> 12.*Robin**Gross* (NCSG  Member)
>>>
>>> 13.Stephen Deerhake (ccNSO  Participant)
>>>
>>> 14.Tatiana Tropina (NCSG  Participant)
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>>
>> -- 
>> Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse  \        / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
>> el at lisse.NA            / *     |   Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
>> PO Box 8421             \     /
>> Bachbrecht, Namibia     ;____/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus