[CCWG-ACCT] poll result and next steps

[epilisse at gmail.com]

Dear Co-Chairs,

there is no definition of "broad support" and under the Charter the only options are "Full Consensus", "Consensus" (and of course "No Consensus").

Please advise by when (updated) Minority Statements are due.

I assume you are also dispensing with Public Comment?

el

--
Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad 4 mini

On 23 Feb 2016, 20:15 +0200, Thomas Rickert<thomas at rickert.net>, wrote:
> 
> [...].
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> We have now taken a look at the outcome of the poll and confirm that - focusing on members and participants only and focusing on members in particular - we have broad support for removal of the language in (2).
> 
> 
> [...]
> 
> 
> We will now proceed and send the finalized report, without (2), to the Chartering Organizations for approval.
> 
> 
> [...]
> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160223/85592e1d/attachment-0001.html>