[CCWG-ACCT] TR: Confirmation that the CCWG-Accountability Supplemental Final Proposal meets the requirements of the CWG-Stewardship

Mathieu Weill mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
Mon Feb 29 10:43:03 UTC 2016


Dear Colleagues,

It is good to be back and find out that you have made great progress
during the last week, as illustrated by the attached correspondence from
the CWG Stewardship chairs, who confirm that our Supplemental Final
proposal meets their requirements.

Best

Mathieu



De : Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jrobinson at afilias.info]
Envoyé : lundi 29 février 2016 11:19
À : 'Grace Abuhamad'; 'Mathieu Weill'; 'Thomas Rickert'; 'León Felipe
Sánchez Ambía'; 'Patrik Fältström'; byron.holland at cira.ca;
thomas.schneider at bakom.admin.ch; jbladel at godaddy.com;
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Cc : 'Lise Fuhr'; 'Robert Hoggarth'; 'Heidi Ullrich'; 'Marika Konings';
'Bart Boswinkel'; 'Steve Sheng'; glen.gery at icann.org; 'Olof Nordling'
Objet : Confirmation that the CCWG-Accountability Supplemental Final
Proposal meets the requirements of the CWG-Stewardship
Importance : Haute



Dear CCWG-Accountability members, participants, and co-chairs,

Confirmation that the CCWG-Accountability Supplemental Final Proposal on
Work Stream 1 Recommendations meets the requirements of the
CWG-Stewardship Final Transition Proposal

We write in response to your group’s recent publication of the
Supplemental Final Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations (the “Final
Proposal”). We have prepared this in our capacities as co-chairs of the
Cross Community Working Group to Develop an IANA Stewardship Transition
Proposal on Naming Related Functions (CWG-Stewardship). Please see our
full response attached to this email.

The CWG-Stewardship final transition proposal submitted for approval to
the chartering organizations on 11 June 2015 is significantly dependent
and expressly conditioned on the implementation of ICANN-level
accountability mechanisms by the CCWG-Accountability. Specifically, as
recognized in the Final Proposal, the CWG-Stewardship Final Transition
Proposal sets forth ICANN accountability requirements regarding Community
Empowerment Mechanism, IANA Functions Budget, IANA Function Reviews,
Customer Standing Committee (“CSC”), Separation Process, Appeals
Mechanism, and Post-Transition IANA (“PTI”), as well as Fundamental
Bylaws. This document is and should be viewed as an element of the
agreed-upon working methods of the CWG-Stewardship and the
CCWG-Accountability.

Thank you for resolving each of the issues raised in our comment letter
relating to your group’s publication of its third draft proposal (the
“Third Draft Proposal”) and for all your hard work in reaching consensus.
As you know, we rely on your work and our trust in the work of your group
is vital in permitting us to focus on the essential aspects of our work on
the stewardship transition.

In summary, we confirm that the Final Proposal meets the requirements of
the CWG-Stewardship final transition proposal. Congratulations on your
Final Proposal and thank-you again all for your collaboration and
cooperation throughout this extended period of intense work.

Yours sincerely,



Lise Fuhr & Jonathan Robinson
Co-Chairs, CWG-Stewardship





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160229/41910026/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: CWG Comment Letter - CCWG Final Proposal - 29 Feb.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 307078 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160229/41910026/CWGCommentLetter-CCWGFinalProposal-29Feb-0001.pdf>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list