[CCWG-ACCT] Request for Clarification on Threshold Issue

Thomas Rickert thomas at rickert.net
Mon Feb 29 21:58:06 UTC 2016

Hi Nigel.
> "Does the Draft Final Report that was transmitted to the COs several days ago accurately represent the agreed work product of the CCWG?"
> That question has a binary answer.

The answer is yes.


> It seems to me that discussion continues on further modifications or amendment to it.
> Is my understanding correct?
> On 29/02/16 18:39, Salaets, Ken wrote:
>> r now, perhaps the previous vote should be revisited.
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160229/d44fb529/signature.asc>

More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list