kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Sat Jan 2 11:35:16 UTC 2016
The more we read and investigate ,the more we find almost impossible to
have an agreed definition of GPI from various aspects .
There is only one refernce in Article 3 of Article of Incorporation to
what GPI could cove and those are outlined in sub-section i through iv of
Those sub-section could form some sort of GPI SESCRIPTION and /or scope of
application and NOTGPI definition . Those sub-sections are narrow refernce
to specific area of GPI in ICANN activities.
In the light of the foregoing, rejection of any Recommendation or part of
the Recommendation contained in CCWG 3rd Proposal SHALL BE CLEARLY AND
SPECIFICALLY ASSOCIATED with any of those sub-section with valid argument
and legal analysis. Consequently by simple statement that " such REC. OR
PART OF THE rec. is inconsistent with GPI is not convincing at all.
2016-01-02 12:10 GMT+01:00 Nigel Roberts <nigel at channelisles.net>:
> Such as the Charter of Fundamental Rights, perhaps?
> I can think of several aspects of the public interest, normally
>> implemented through Applicable Laws, which ICANN and its contracted
>> parties should respect.
>> PS:We foresaw that when ICANN was being set up.
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community