[CCWG-ACCT] The Internet's design and ICANN responsibility (was Re: GPI)

[Barrack Otieno]

In agreement as well.

Best Regards<div id="DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2"><table
style="border-top: 1px solid #aaabb6; margin-top: 10px;">
	<tr>
		<td style="width: 105px; padding-top: 15px;">
			<a href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail"
target="_blank"><img
src="https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/logo-avast-v1.png" style="width:
90px; height:33px;"/></a>
		</td>
		<td style="width: 470px; padding-top: 20px; color: #41424e;
font-size: 13px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
line-height: 18px;">This email has been sent from a virus-free
computer protected by Avast. <br /><a
href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail"
target="_blank" style="color: #4453ea;">www.avast.com</a>
		</td>
	</tr>
</table><a href="#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2" width="1"
height="1"></a></div>

On 1/6/16, Izumi Okutani <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
> + 1. Just to repeat from the last call -
>
> This is very much inline with the stance the numbers community have been
> taking towards ICANN; we desire an ICANN which simply performs its functions
> and the narrow responsibilities, based on its well-understood and needed
> functions. (In the numbers case, as specified in the ASO MOU  & the new IANA
> number registry services SLA)
>
> Izumi
>
> On 2016/01/06 5:34, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
>> I personally agree also.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Bruce Tonkin
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
>> [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of
>> David Post
>> Sent: Wednesday, 6 January 2016 1:52 AM
>> To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
>> Cc: accountability-cross-community at icann.org
>> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] The Internet's design and ICANN responsibility
>> (was Re: GPI)
>>
>> At 04:19 PM 1/2/2016, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> SNIP
>>> So, I don't think "the global public interest", whatever that means,
>>> does anything to help us to understand what ICANN should do.  ICANN
>>> should pay attention to its well-understood and needed functions.  It
>>> should not go adventuring out into global governance issues that
>>> distract from that narrow set of responsibilities.  And it should not
>>> embrace language that distracts from the narrow responsibilities --
>>> lest such language become an attractive nuisance that encourages people
>>> to think ICANN has power it never has had and (given the design of the
>>> Internet) can't get.
>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Very well put.
>> David
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *******************************
>> David G Post - Senior Fellow, Open Technology Institute/New America
>> Foundation blog (Volokh Conspiracy)
>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/people/david-post
>> book (Jefferson's Moose)  http://tinyurl.com/c327w2n music
>> http://tinyurl.com/davidpostmusic publications etc.
>> http://www.davidpost.com
>> *******************************
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>


-- 
Barrack O. Otieno
+254721325277
+254-20-2498789
Skype: barrack.otieno
http://www.otienobarrack.me.ke/