[CCWG-ACCT] On behalf of Co-Chairs - Public comment summary/analysis

[Matthew Shears]

Alice

Very helpful collation/summary.

One small edit on CDT's input.  On rec. 1 col. G could you replace the 
words Sole Member with Sole Designator (CDT supported the Sole Member 
but is comfortable supporting the Sole Designator model in the proposal).

Thanks.

Matthew

On 06/01/2016 16:44, Schaefer, Brett wrote:
>
> Alice,
>
> Thank you for this. The Heritage Foundation’s opposition to full GAC 
> participation in the empowered community was not noted in the Rec 1 
> analysis. As stated in our comment, we think that GAC should be 
> strictly advisory.
>
> On Rec 7 analysis, I’m concerned that our position may be 
> misunderstood. We support including DIDP in an appeals process, but we 
> are very much against restricting it to the engagement, escalation, 
> and enforcement staircase because that process is dependent on the 
> Empowered Community. DIDP appeals need to be accessible to everyone, 
> not just the SOACs, and appeals should not require SOAC approval at 
> any threshold. This may require moving DIDP appeals to the request for 
> reconsideration process.
>
> On Rec 11, the one sentence summary gives the impression that we 
> support Rec 11. We do not and offered specific proposals on how to 
> change the text to address our concerns, which were not included in 
> the Rec 11 analysis.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Brett
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> BrettSchaefer
> Jay Kingham Senior Research Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs
> Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom Davis Institute for National 
> Security and Foreign Policy
> The Heritage Foundation
> 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE
> Washington, DC 20002
> 202-608-6097
> heritage.org <http://heritage.org/>
>
> *From:*accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org 
> [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf 
> Of *Alice Jansen
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 06, 2016 9:04 AM
> *To:* accountability-cross-community at icann.org
> *Subject:* [CCWG-ACCT] On behalf of Co-Chairs - Public comment 
> summary/analysis
>
> _On behalf of CCWG-ACCT Co-Chairs_
>
> Dear all,
>
> Attached to this email you will find a staff produced summary and 
> analysis of the public comments received on our Draft Proposal.
>
> In preparation for our January discussions, we encourage you to read 
> the document as well as comments available for full reference at: 
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/. 
> Note: a /download all/ page is available at 
> https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=56984613
>
> Please note that we cannot convert the spreadsheet into a PDF, the 
> tabs and spreadsheet being too large. Thank you for your understanding.
>
> Staff will post the summary on the public forum box on Friday, 8 
> January - 
> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-2015-11-30-en. 
> In the meantime, it is located on your wiki at 
> https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=56984613
>
> Thank you
>
> Best regards
>
> Mathieu, Thomas, León
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

-- 

Matthew Shears
Director - Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology
mshears at cdt.org
+ 44 771 247 2987



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160106/6c99964e/attachment-0001.html>