[CCWG-ACCT] Recommendation 12 - work stream 2 - 1st reading conclusions

Robin Gross robin at ipjustice.org
Wed Jan 6 22:26:06 UTC 2016

Several comments in the public comment period called for a specific WS2 transparency issue of “transparency over board deliberations”.  NCSG was among those commenters.  How do we include the views of those who’s comments weren’t taken into account in the document / discussion for 1st reading on Rec. 12 in yesterday’s call?   The GNSO’s comments don’t come in until next week, so how will they be incorporated into Rec. 12 if we’ve already done the 2 readings before we’ve even seen the GNSO view on Rec. 12?  It looks like only the board’s concerns were reflected in the document / discussion for the 1st reading of Rec #12.  How do we include other stakeholder concerns in these discussions?


> On Jan 6, 2016, at 6:02 AM, Mathieu Weill <Mathieu.Weill at afnic.fr> wrote:
> <Formatted-Annex 12-PROOFED-1stREAD.pdf>

More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list