[CCWG-ACCT] Deck for Meeting #75 Mission Statement discussion

Malcolm Hutty malcolm at linx.net
Sat Jan 9 13:31:39 UTC 2016



> On 8 Jan 2016, at 17:49, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
> 
> Perhaps we should test against a set of things that the Board decided
> were in scope in the past years and see whether they would still be in
> scope with the rewrite.

Do you believe that the definition of whether something is in scope is whether the Board previously considered it in scope?


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list