[CCWG-ACCT] re-iterating the request for transparent communication!
mshears at cdt.org
Tue Jan 12 13:43:57 UTC 2016
I would like to support this request. I find it troubling that comments
on the proposal by the CCWG's counsel are not being taken into account.
On 12/01/2016 08:03, farzaneh badii wrote:
> Dear Co-Chairs, All
> Previously, I requested for a transparent public communication channel
> which allowed everyone to have access to communication between Staff,
> Co-chairs and others, especially when drafting the proposal. It was
> not taken into consideration. No public channel was provided for such
> communication. This would have prevented alot of speculations.
> Now listening to what CCWG lawyers have to say about not including
> their comments in the drafts of CCWG proposal (here is the link to
> lawyers concerns https://community.icann.org/x/15dlAw ) which might be
> just due to a total oversight, I was wondering if I could ask for two
> 1. Please make a public communication channel for co-chair
> communication with Staff, communication among staff, and any
> communication that has an effect on drafting the proposal.
> 2. The lawyers in this call stated that some of their comments were
> requested to be posted,including some that were sent on Sunday, but
> they have not been. Can you please clarify which comments and why they
> have not been posted and if it is an oversight I would like to request
> all their comments that have not been posted to be posted as soon as
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
Director - Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology
mshears at cdt.org
+ 44 771 247 2987
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community